Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Pets\s+NOT\s+allowed\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 17:32:23 -0500
Nor, from past discussions, are children, and spectators are just tolerated. I guess it's lucky they let drivers and cars on site. Just like everyone is responsible for their own behavior at an event
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00470.html (8,215 bytes)

2. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:19:57 -0500
My lovely spouse seldom attends local events, but she is inclined on occassion to jump in the RV and head out to a two day event to enjoy the countryside.. However, if the dog can't go, she can't go.
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00472.html (9,173 bytes)

3. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: Hottvr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 21:15:42 EST
<< Something about Roger's leg that excites him.... Phil O. -- Original Message -- >> We could sell tickets??? I would pay to see that!! No wait!!! Bring your dog to the Nationals talent show and ent
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00473.html (7,832 bytes)

4. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 21:25:27 -0500
Uhhh, Nationals was the last time Cody saw Roger...in fact, he's a 100 percenter! Of course, he's only four years old... psosborn@gte.net your
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00475.html (8,516 bytes)

5. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 22:06:58 -0600
I guess you missed the part where the site owner is the one restricting the pets. We try not to argue with site owners too often. :) Pat
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00476.html (7,919 bytes)

6. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 13:02:51 -0500
tolerated. No, I didn't miss that, which is why I truncated the subject line. My reply was directed at Rocky's blanket endorsement: " Kudos and huzzahs to the site owner! Autocross sites and race tra
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00483.html (8,774 bytes)

7. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:09:48 -0600
tolerated. are them. Thanks. And I agree with you about whose responsibility it is, and if everyone were responsible and all dogs were well trained there would be no problem. My dogbite, in fact, tur
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00486.html (10,698 bytes)

8. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:16:12 -0800
Note that everything you said is equally valid if the word "child" is substituted! KeS
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00488.html (9,219 bytes)

9. RE: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Zahornasky" <p.zahornasky@att.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:12:58 -0500
Let's take a scenario: Husband and wife both autocross. It's an hour to get to an event, they want to get there early so they leave at 6AM. They stay the day, pick up their trophies and leave a say,
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00489.html (9,241 bytes)

10. RE: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 15:41:44 -0600
<<Note that everything you said is equally valid if the word "child" is And speaking as someone who's seventies-era youth was spent at a AutoX or club race each weekend, WE DON'T WANT TO BE THERE! Al
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00490.html (8,497 bytes)

11. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:19:27 -0600
They care more at players came interferes Not true! :-O You never saw Mark McGwire with his kid ON THE FIELD when he was hitting his record-setting home runs? It was a wonderful father-son moment sha
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00492.html (11,391 bytes)

12. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:44:17 -0800
No, and neither did you. I did see him afterwards, during the celebration. You never saw Marge Schott with her dog on the sidelines? ;) If the kid's above about the age of four, yeah. Note that you'
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00493.html (12,040 bytes)

13. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 18:24:57 -0500
Pardon me, but I thought we were an amateur organization, and family participation was encouraged. For some folks, the family pet is part of the family. And Davey Looman's dog could set up pylons! As
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00494.html (9,841 bytes)

14. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:30:05 -0500 (EST)
Take everything you wrote and substitute "non-driving wife" for "dog". Now do you understand why some folks want their dog with them? Mark (no, in fact I'm serious and not making some sorta sexist r
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00497.html (10,006 bytes)

15. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:33:14 -0500 (EST)
Good to see you're keeping an open mind. I don't like old people. They have slow reflexes and are a danger behind the wheel. I don't mind if they're at an event though, as long as I don't see them.
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00498.html (8,781 bytes)

16. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:51:33 EST
And I'll say the same about your kid... CHD
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00500.html (8,644 bytes)

17. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: Hottvr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:59:54 EST
<< Good to see you're keeping an open mind. I don't like old people. They have slow reflexes and are a danger behind the wheel. I don't mind if they're at an event though, as long as I don't see them
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00501.html (8,733 bytes)

18. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:08:48 -0600
the Yeah, but he never got them square in the box! :-) Still, if all dogs were like Shempi complainers like me would be out of ammunition. but Kevin was a little bit too, and I think the debate was f
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00502.html (10,193 bytes)

19. RE: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:12:06 -0600
Really it's all about the oppresive SCCA. Just another guise for The Man. The Man knows that if my dog got to ride along our combined super powers would give me FTD everytime. I bet Schroth makes a h
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00503.html (9,214 bytes)

20. Re: Pets NOT allowed.... (score: 1)
Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:11:26 -0600
Hmmm. I have a non-driving wife I dearly love having with me at events. Point taken! But, uh, what do YOU do with your dog in the motel room at night???? --Rocky
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00504.html (8,981 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu