Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Opinions\s+of\s+\"cost\s+of\s+ownership\"\s+of\s+R\-R\s+cars\s+\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Opinions\s+of\s+\"cost\s+of\s+ownership\"\s+of\s+R\-R\s+cars\s+\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Opinions of "cost of ownership" of R-R cars ... (score: 1): Author: geomowat@vossnet.co.uk (George Mowat-Brown); Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 18:25:47 +0100; The aesthetics of mark I over mark II are very much in the eye of the beholder, my own feeling is that the mark I version looks a bit nicer, but the multitude of mechanical improvements over the prod; /html/rolls-bentley/1998-04/msg00001.html (12,055 bytes)
2. Re: Opinions of "cost of ownership" of R-R cars ... (score: 1): Author: Carl Follstad <farkle@winternet.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 11:38:15 -0600; I agree on your MK I versus MK II differences and prices would support my purchase of an earlier model, but the 2000+ modification that R-R made over lifetime of the car makes a later one more desira; /html/rolls-bentley/1998-04/msg00002.html (12,391 bytes)
3. Opinions of "cost of ownership" of R-R cars ... (score: 1): Author: Carl Follstad <farkle@winternet.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 23:21:01 -0600 (CST); I just read a message on the declining availability of parts for Bentley R-types. Got me thinking and I am wondering if I could bend an ear (fingers?) for an opinion or two. I have been an avid fan; /html/rolls-bentley/1998-03/msg00005.html (8,070 bytes)
4. Re: Opinions of "cost of ownership" of R-R cars ... (score: 1): Author: Berry Kercheval <berry@kerch.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 23:53:46 -0800; I have a Mk VI and just purchased a T-Bentley. Mk VI parts are a bit scarce, but there are several specialists (Replacement Parts, Tony Handler, Oregon Crewe Cutters), and the clubs (BDC, and RROC) c; /html/rolls-bentley/1998-03/msg00006.html (9,124 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]