Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Oil\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Oil\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Oil question (score: 1): Author: JM Dion <dion.longpre@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 20:54:44 -0400; Did anyone hear that SAE 80w90 is too heavy for a Triumph Tranny and could cause early failure ? A local English parts dealer told me that there is a mistake in the books who recommand SAE 90 (but I; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00350.html (6,646 bytes)
2. Re: Oil question (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Hall" <shall@fastpointcom.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 21:23:08 -0400; Wow. I've never heard anything like that. I've been using the 80w90 in the transmission and diff. for years with no problems... that never 20W50.; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00353.html (7,217 bytes)
3. Re: Oil question (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 20:53:46 -0700; If it was a mistake, it was one that was repeated time and time again! While early Triumphs (TR2, 3, 4, etc.) did recommend running engine oil in the transmissions, I don't it holds true of Spitfire; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00355.html (7,062 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]