Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*No\s+Bumping\s+of\s+Single\s+Cars\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*No\s+Bumping\s+of\s+Single\s+Cars\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1): Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:15:43 -0700; There is no longer bumping allowed for single car classes? Was it taken from the rule book? Scott Meyers; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01121.html (7,559 bytes)
2. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:20:17 -0700; Appendix B. It was always a recommended bumping order should a region want to do bumping. I quote (from the '97 book, latest one I have handy, I doubt it's changed): "Bumping" is not approved for cha; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01123.html (8,511 bytes)
3. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1): Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:44:28 -0700; The original premise was at local events to provide competition for single cars.....With Pax available these days I would favor a Pax/Stock or Pax/Prepared type classes for single cars. For many of u; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01129.html (7,964 bytes)
4. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 06:44:00 -0500; You can't voluntarily bump yourself. Patrick Washburn <washburn@dwave.net> Wausau, WI Land of Cheese 95 DS Neon Moooooooooo.; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01141.html (7,341 bytes)
5. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1): Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 08:45:11 -0700; No, but it can be the established format of the event, as put forward in the supps, that any single car class will be "bumped". I still favor a Pax grouping for single cars however, and think it far; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01163.html (7,809 bytes)
6. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 11:02:56 -0500; 'disrespected' if trophies THEIR fault........ :-) The flawed logic here is that a trophy in one class is or should be precisely equivalent to a trophy in some other class. That'll never happen. Ther; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01164.html (8,205 bytes)
7. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 18:45:59 EDT; trophies fault........ :-) Jay responded: <The flawed logic here is that a trophy in one class is or should <be precisely equivalent to a trophy in some other class. That'll <never happen. There will; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01195.html (10,879 bytes)
8. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1): Author: Oasis3223@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 22:30:56 EDT; remember, regions can do as they please,,, we have had many competitors, who for instance, had an EM car, ran an event, it broke, ran their stock , say, Neon, next week in EMod just to keep in the po; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01222.html (7,496 bytes)
9. Re: No Bumping of Single Cars? (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 11:56:12 -0400; had very little direct competition. Expect this to change next year. The hordes are coming! The hordes are coming! DG; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01263.html (7,288 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]