Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+rule\?\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+rule\?\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: "Miller, Reginald R." <reginald.miller@unisys.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:48:57 -0500; Would anyone venture a guess why Rick Gould and Chris Cox ran their Miata in ASP at Round 3 of the Sacramento CUP? With all the work required to redo the points and the web page I'm thinking about st; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00659.html (7,443 bytes)
2. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:21:55 -0700; In theory, it's the responsibility for a competitor to correctly classify his/her car. If s/he fails to do that, a class competitor can protest the results, and finishing positions. I'm assuming Ric; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00663.html (8,186 bytes)
3. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:05:20 -0700; In theory, the competitor is supposed to have the correct class on their car and tech inspection is supposed to check it. Failing this, there is little way for a competitor to know who is actually ru; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00680.html (9,084 bytes)
4. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:28:01 -0700 (PDT); Nope. 3.3.3 ..."Safety inspection is not concerned with the legality of a car. The organizing Region may at its discretion provide an advisory inspection for vehicle classification and legality, in c; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00682.html (8,252 bytes)
5. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 21:58:20 EDT; Well, a CSP Miata is legal for AM, and OSP, but there is no provision (in SCCA at least) to "self bump" your car into a "higher" class. Charlie; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00686.html (7,425 bytes)
6. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:07:48 -0700; I was not addressing class legality, only the need to properly display correct numbers and class letters on the car. Correct in this context is simply the class entered. I was once temporarily failed; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00687.html (8,235 bytes)
7. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:47:14 -0700; what does this mean? i am 10 points out of a trophy because of out-of-class cars running the one day i beat that starlet. -james; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00688.html (7,994 bytes)
8. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:49:32 -0700; oh i think i see. if you are a G-stock car, you cant just run in D-stock if you feel like it. nevermind. -james; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00689.html (7,855 bytes)
9. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:05:15 -0700; Out of class? I thought most anything went in OSP? A 240Z fits great... --Pat Kelly; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00691.html (8,253 bytes)
10. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: TummyRub@aol.com; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:44:26 EDT; racing events? .....Gary; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00694.html (7,653 bytes)
11. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 21:02:01 -0700; sorry, i realized what you meant right after i sent the message. i think my message explaining that got lost in pacbell hell :) -james out-of-class (in; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00695.html (8,934 bytes)
12. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 21:03:32 -0700 (PDT); Sorry, read "it" as referring to "correct class". I hate indefinite pronouns. Actually, I'm not much fond of English at all, which is unfortunate as it's the only language I'm fluent in. KeS; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00697.html (8,729 bytes)
13. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 00:27:59 EDT; And some have questioned even that... CHD; /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00699.html (7,435 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]