Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+engine\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+engine\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. New engine (score: 1): Author: "Ronak, TP (Timothy)" <Timothy.P.Ronak@akzo-nobel.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 22:32:47 -0500; I haven't posted in a while as I have been just swamped with travel so it is good to be back. I have just discovered a rattle from inside the original 260 and by all of my investigation it sounds li; /html/tigers/2000-08/msg00032.html (8,087 bytes)
2. Re: New engine (score: 1): Author: "Chris J. Richards" <richards@northcoast.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 21:06:49 -0400; Tim- If you are interested in getting rid of your troublesome 260 block, let me Chris in Trinidad; /html/tigers/2000-08/msg00034.html (8,582 bytes)
3. Re: New engine (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 07:58:24 -0400; Hi Tim. I put a 1990 5.0L in my Tiger, and here is what I did. I used a GM 1 wire alternator, and a stock Ford alternator bracket, sort of a triangle shape, very common, then applied a hammer to get; /html/tigers/2000-08/msg00036.html (7,813 bytes)
4. Re: New engine (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@flash.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 08:15:10 -0700; I do not know all the answers to your questions, but in investigating all possibilities (inquiring minds want to know), I have had a few interesting revelations. I'll share them with you, but they a; /html/tigers/2000-08/msg00040.html (12,742 bytes)
5. Re: New engine (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 11:59:14 -0700; Just to make sure you haven't created a misunderstanding regarding 302 versus 5.0L, I believe they are exactly the same engine in terms of bore and stroke and the 5.0L designation probably was a mar; /html/tigers/2000-08/msg00043.html (7,844 bytes)
6. Re: New engine (score: 1): Author: Tom Hall <modtiger@engravers.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 14:37:06 -0700; There are two features on the late (86+) 5.0 small block which are important to some owners. The first is the longer lifter bores which allow the OEM roller lifters to operate correctly. This seeming; /html/tigers/2000-08/msg00045.html (8,118 bytes)
7. Re: New engine (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 20:23:20 EDT; << There are two features on the late (86+) 5.0 small block which are important to some owners. >> I'm not sure if anyone has pointed out that the '86-on roller cam H.O. block also has more beef in t; /html/tigers/2000-08/msg00047.html (8,279 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]