Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Nationals\s+protests\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Nationals protests (score: 1)
Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 11:50:23 -0500
Message text written by Jim Ochi " No, there's nothing in the Street Modified section of the rule book (2002 or 2003) that either defines a "weenie" protest, or disallows them." -- End Original Messa
/html/ba-autox/2003-04/msg00003.html (7,073 bytes)

2. Re: Nationals protests (score: 1)
Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:33:39 -0800
I've been saying since the class began that eventually SM will come to mean $eriou$ Money. Scot
/html/ba-autox/2003-04/msg00011.html (6,817 bytes)

3. Nationals protests (score: 1)
Author: "Josh Sirota" <josh@sirota.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:58:19 -0800
as Maybe it's just me, but I think this is a grossly unfair statement. I know a lot of people who have been on both sides of the protest system, and I can honestly say that every single protest that
/html/ba-autox/2003-03/msg00281.html (8,485 bytes)

4. Re: Nationals protests (score: 1)
Author: Ms Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:43:49 -0800 (PST)
At nationals last year, a friend of mine was telling me that he was going to protest a competitor because he didn't have the proper badge on his car. I said, Don't be a dork, you can see what kind of
/html/ba-autox/2003-03/msg00282.html (7,847 bytes)

5. Re: Nationals protests (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@winchell.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:58:03 -0800
an I talked to Mark Madarash at Nationals last year to drop his protest of Tom Berry in ESP. Despite accepting the assertion ... by the protest committee... that the incorrect repair of the car did
/html/ba-autox/2003-03/msg00283.html (9,289 bytes)

6. Re: Nationals protests (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:04:02 -0800 (PST)
Odd, I thought he was insisting that they have legal cars. It's pointless to argue that the method of modification doesn't matter, when the method of modification is what the rules address. As a dif
/html/ba-autox/2003-03/msg00285.html (8,247 bytes)

7. Re: Nationals protests (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@winchell.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:52:26 -0800
I talked with him a long time. He was quite animated/emotional about this mechanic's thing. It was clear to me that was what was motivating him. I don't know why... maybe he had some bad experience
/html/ba-autox/2003-03/msg00287.html (7,909 bytes)

8. Nationals protests (score: 1)
Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:46:47 -0500
RE: Nationals Protests Yours truly had the honor of having the first engine teardown at the Solo II Nationals. The bulk of the people (about 3 or 4) signing on to the protest, indeed, felt we were ch
/html/ba-autox/2003-03/msg00291.html (7,745 bytes)

9. Re: Nationals protests (score: 1)
Author: Jim Ochi <jim_ochi@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:49:44 -0800
No, there's nothing in the Street Modified section of the rule book (2002 or 2003) that either defines a "weenie" protest, or disallows them. Street Modified follows the exact same protest procedures
/html/ba-autox/2003-03/msg00312.html (7,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu