- 1. NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1)
- Author: richard.arnold@juno.com (Richard D. Arnold)
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 1998 08:59:04 EST
- Knowing this is way off topic, I will consider myself flamed in advance. Would appreciate the assistance of those with a more scientific mind than my own: Am working on a project for school (an Evide
- /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00210.html (9,782 bytes)
- 2. NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1)
- Author: richard.arnold@juno.com (Richard D. Arnold)
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 1998 09:01:09 EST
- Knowing this is way off topic, I will consider myself flamed in advance. Would appreciate the assistance of those with a more scientific mind than my own: Am working on a project for school (an Evide
- /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00212.html (9,794 bytes)
- 3. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Soave" <redlotus@spacey.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 21:18:43 -0500
- Kids are asleep, Bugeye's running good, wife has a headache, already worked out - nothing else to do: A. 60/5 = 12 mph; 60/4 = 15 mph; 60/3 = 20 mph, etc. B. 1mph = 1.47 ft/sec; @ 3.5 mph walk, that'
- /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00225.html (11,925 bytes)
- 4. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1)
- Author: Nory@webtv.net (Nory)
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:03:26 -0500
- Regardless of your calculations, it's pretty tough to claim you fired four shots in self-defense. I would think one shot would have been sufficient to stop the approaching attacker. -NORY Don't assum
- /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00236.html (7,872 bytes)
- 5. Re: NO LBC -- WAY OFF TOPIC (score: 1)
- Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 11:26:55 -0500
- Please note that "knock-down power" is a product of television only, not of physics. In order for a bullet to be travelling fast enough to knock someone down, it would have to be accelerated to this
- /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00244.html (8,819 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu