Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Multiweight\s+oil\s+viscosity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Multiweight\s+oil\s+viscosity\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Multiweight oil viscosity (score: 1): Author: DANIELS@LMSBV2.TAMU.EDU (Lee Daniels, Texas A&M University); Date: Wed, 6 Apr 1994 14:03:39 -0500 (CDT); Yes, it is not correct. A designation such as 20W-50 (W stands for "winter") simply means that the cold viscosity is approx. that of a straight 20-wt at that temperature, and the hot viscosity is app; /html/british-cars/1994-04/msg00123.html (8,233 bytes)
2. Re: Multiweight oil viscosity (score: 1): Author: DANIELS@LMSBV2.TAMU.EDU (Lee Daniels, Texas A&M University); Date: Wed, 6 Apr 1994 15:03:04 -0500 (CDT); Yes, I blew it -- right out the oil seal. Here's another try at this - the multiweight oil has viscosity A at low temp and B at high temp, but the viscosity at higher temp is *always* less than at lo; /html/british-cars/1994-04/msg00130.html (8,093 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]