- 1. Moss's new seat belts (score: 1)
- Author: Aaron Whiteman <awhitema@panix.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 20:11:58 -0800
- So I just got back from a 300 mile ski trip (150 miles to Sandpoint, ski...., drive home). It was good. Snow could have been fresher, but the weather was nice and I kicked my own butt on the mountain
- /html/mgs/2006-03/msg00060.html (7,959 bytes)
- 2. Re: Moss's new seat belts (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:05:50 -0000
- Must be a very strong return spring, or you have very sensitive skin. I've driven both my MGs for up to 500 miles and eight hours per day with nothing like that. PaulH. -- Original Message --
- /html/mgs/2006-03/msg00062.html (6,899 bytes)
- 3. Re: Moss's new seat belts (score: 1)
- Author: Aaron Whiteman <awhitema@panix.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 12:52:50 -0800
- I don't think I have very sensitive skin; this is the first time I've had real problems in 35K miles with these belts. I am no stranger to 300+ mile days. However, this might have been the first long
- /html/mgs/2006-03/msg00070.html (7,602 bytes)
- 4. RE: Moss's new seat belts (score: 1)
- Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:11:09 -0800
- The new Moss kits use a different retractor unit, but it does have the same constant tension function. I don't know how much difference there would be in tension. This keeps the seat belt from loose
- /html/mgs/2006-03/msg00078.html (8,628 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu