Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Mk\s+IV\s+Engine\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Mk\s+IV\s+Engine\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Mk IV Engine (score: 1): Author: Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou <dougbert@rcn.com>; Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 15:02:48 -0500; I, too, have a '72 MK IV (FK26439L), which is probably the wimpiest-engined Spitfire. I think this engine has 8:1 compression. What would have to be done to raise the compression to 9:1? Would the h; /html/spitfires/1999-07/msg00225.html (7,283 bytes)
2. Re: Mk IV Engine (score: 1): Author: Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou <dougbert@rcn.com>; Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 21:02:24 -0500; What would the effect of these various modes be on emissions testing? Here in NJ, they test just HC and CO at idle (although this might change in the near future). I suspect that increased compressio; /html/spitfires/1999-07/msg00238.html (7,848 bytes)
3. Re: Mk IV Engine (score: 1): Author: Atwell Haines <carbuff@nac.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 20:48:10 -0400; FYI the emissions testing procedure for pre-1981 cars will remain the same with NJ's new testing rules. Only the wait in the line will be longer!! Cheers, Atwell Haines '79 Spitfire [Waiting 5 more; /html/spitfires/1999-07/msg00259.html (8,313 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]