Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Minimum\s+rotor\s+thickness\s+for\s+Mk\s+2\s+spitfire\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Minimum\s+rotor\s+thickness\s+for\s+Mk\s+2\s+spitfire\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Minimum rotor thickness for Mk 2 spitfire (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 18:13:02 -0800; I took my 9 inch disc brake rotors into the machine shop to get them turned, but they won't do it until they know what the minimum thickness is (liability reasons). I've looked in my workshop manual; /html/triumphs/1997-01/msg00185.html (7,158 bytes)
2. Re: Minimum rotor thickness for Mk 2 spitfire (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 07 Jan 1997 00:16:06 -0600; ERIC: The only data I could find came from an old Clymer Publication. I'll quote as written in the manual: "the maximum run-out permissible on the disc is .004". Under no circumstances should more th; /html/triumphs/1997-01/msg00193.html (8,086 bytes)
3. RE: Minimum rotor thickness for Mk 2 spitfire (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 09:47:51 -0800; Well, this is a start. I think I've figured out what the Clymer pub means. It's saying we can't take more than .060" off of the rotor when we turn it. The big missing piece of data is the original th; /html/triumphs/1997-01/msg00208.html (7,618 bytes)
4. RE: Minimum rotor thickness for Mk 2 spitfire (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 13:47:24 -0800; FWIW, I finally got through to the TRF technical line. They told me the original thickness is 9.6mm, with the minimum thickness being 8.2mm.; /html/triumphs/1997-01/msg00218.html (7,037 bytes)
5. RE: Minimum rotor thickness for Mk 2 spitfire (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 07 Jan 1997 17:48:51 -0500; origin and translated into Reg'lar measurements instead of monkeymeters, that's 3/8" (.375) new, 5/16" (.313) minimum. Anachronistically your'n, Claude Hopper SW Ohio '43 Enfield .303 '72 Trident 750; /html/triumphs/1997-01/msg00221.html (7,156 bytes)
6. Re: Minimum rotor thickness for Mk 2 spitfire (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 18:57:34 -0500; <<Well, this is a start. I think I've figured out what the Clymer pub means. It's saying we can't take more than .060" off of the rotor when we turn it. The big missing piece of data is the original; /html/triumphs/1997-01/msg00227.html (7,780 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]