Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MPH\s+vs\.\s+RPM\,\s+Spitfire\s+1500\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MPH\s+vs\.\s+RPM\,\s+Spitfire\s+1500\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: MPH vs. RPM, Spitfire 1500 (score: 1): Author: "Tom O'Malley" <tomomalley@meganet.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:08:52 -0500; I've been chatting with Michael offlist about his speedometer problems. I'm starting to wonder though, about the differences in the UK vrs U.S. odometer calibration. Not the MPH. His odometer and mi; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00301.html (8,463 bytes)
2. Re: MPH vs. RPM, Spitfire 1500 (score: 1): Author: Michael Hargreave Mawson <OC@46thFoot.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 00:33:06 +0000; That would be one answer - the other would be that either you or I have the wrong speedo in our cars... The Imperial Mile ought to be pretty close to a kilometre. The word "mile" comes from the Latin; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00302.html (8,936 bytes)
3. Re: MPH vs. RPM, Spitfire 1500 (score: 1): Author: "T. .R. Dafforn" <td214@cam.ac.uk>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:30:36 +0000; I've always relied on the rev counter for speed measurement. reasonable rule, the angle of the the speedo and rev counter needles should match when the car is running in fourth! Cheers Tim -- Tim Daf; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00305.html (7,638 bytes)
4. Re: MPH vs. RPM, Spitfire 1500 (score: 1): Author: "Bob Norway" <examiner@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:32:02 -0500; GPS position accuracy would have no bearing (pun intended) on measuring speed, as you are measuring time to go from point A to point B, not any SPECIFIC point to another SPECIFIC point, which could e; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00315.html (8,659 bytes)
5. Re: MPH vs. RPM, Spitfire 1500 (score: 1): Author: Donald H Locker <dhl@chelseamsl.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:54:36 -0500 (EST); Two notes: Roman Legionaires had regular legs -- a pace is two steps (left foot to left foot) so each step was 0.8 yards long. The calibration procedure involved using a lot of soldiers and taking th; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00333.html (8,244 bytes)
6. Re: MPH vs. RPM, Spitfire 1500 (score: 1): Author: "Laura Gharazeddine" <Laura.G@141.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:02:49 -0700; For a moment I had to check which list this came from-I thought it was the Al Stewart Mailing List, but couldn't remember the thread! (Greg Rowe will know what I'm talking about.) Laura G. steps the; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00336.html (8,759 bytes)
7. Re: MPH vs. RPM, Spitfire 1500 (score: 1): Author: Michael Hargreave Mawson <OC@46thFoot.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 09:12:56 +0000; Ah, very *short* legs! Many thanks for a serious answer to a facetious question. ATB -- Mike Michael Hargreave Mawson, author of "Eyewitness in the Crimea" http://www.greenhillbooks.com/booksheets/ey; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00346.html (8,264 bytes)
8. Re: MPH vs. RPM, Spitfire 1500 (score: 1): Author: reed mideke <rfm@redshift.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:07:01 -0800; [...] Well, don't know about Triumph but some manufacturers certainly change the spedo gear to match the rear end. I know nissan does this for certain. The speedo gears are color coded for the variou; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00371.html (8,089 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]