- 1. Re: MG TF (long) (score: 1)
- Author: <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:11:08 -0000
- Whilst MG Rover *are* guilty of causing confusion they are not reusing an old name any more than the MGA or the MGB did. The new model is the 'MGTF'. With the manufacturer being 'MG' the full designa
- /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00014.html (7,564 bytes)
- 2. Re: MG TF (long) (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin Sullivan <kevins@khoral.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:32:01 -0700 (MST)
- Neither. Car companies reuse names all the time. Magnette, for example. -- Kevin Sullivan kevins@khoral.com Khoral Research Inc. Albuquerque NM USA 1968 Dodge W-200 Crewcab "PW" www.khoral.com/staff/
- /html/mgs/2002-02/msg00015.html (7,096 bytes)
- 3. MG TF (long) (score: 1)
- Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:10:58 -0800
- from <http://www.autoexpress.co.uk>, a first impression of the (new) MGTF: MG TF When Rover unveiled its original MGF, sports cars around the world stood humbled. Here was a mid-engined two-seater th
- /html/mgs/2002-01/msg01097.html (10,862 bytes)
- 4. Re: MG TF (long) (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob D." <bobmgtd@home.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:54:48 -0500
- Why did Rover call the new car "TF"? Don't they realize MG already had a TF Same thing with Saab, a friend of mine was telling me all about his new Saab 95. I told him my Dad had a Saab 95 back in th
- /html/mgs/2002-01/msg01107.html (6,761 bytes)
- 5. Re: MG TF (long) (score: 1)
- Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:41:03 -0800
- Well, with Saab, I believe it's a 9 with the 5 raised up, like 9 to the 5th power. So it's not "ninety-five", it's "nine-five". So that's different, I guess. As to what the new MG marketeers where th
- /html/mgs/2002-01/msg01108.html (7,384 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu