- 1. Re: Long-Backfire damage (score: 1)
- Author: Craig Wright <craig@productdesigngroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 09:35:31 -0800
- Hello Bob, Your valve process looks good. I'll start using it. Is this the sequence that places the lobes opposite the lifters during adjustment? I noticed when I first did the 427 that the lash did
- /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00003.html (10,124 bytes)
- 2. RE: Long-Backfire damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 07:50:36 -0800
- I found it curious that none of the procedures I've seen make the adjustment directly on the heel of the lobe; i.e., "opposite the lifters" as you say. My procedure gives more margin for error on se
- /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00004.html (8,219 bytes)
- 3. RE: Long-Backfire damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:10:14 -0800
- I hope you are making progress on fixing the backfire gremlin. I thought I would take the opportunity to contribute my two cents worth to the List on adjusting valves. Since I have a solid lifter fl
- /html/tigers/2001-01/msg00286.html (8,811 bytes)
- 4. RE: Long-Backfire damage (score: 1)
- Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:08:51 -0500
- So far, no luck. Cruise at 45 to 50, nail the throttle and KAPOW through the carb every time every time. Crane Cams had a little note that too tight of an adjustment could cause a backfire through t
- /html/tigers/2001-01/msg00299.html (10,616 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu