Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Leaf\s+spring\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Leaf\s+spring\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Leaf spring (score: 1): Author: Paul <compubbs@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 21:04:26 -0300; I remember seeing this in the Triumph list, but I just want to make sure... I'm considering buying a new leaf spring for my mk2 spitfire. Would I be much better off buying the rotoflex one for the m; /html/spitfires/1998-05/msg00178.html (6,823 bytes)
2. Re: Leaf spring (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 17:59:41 -0700; If you want to improve the handling, the ideal thing is to use a Swing Spring assembly from a MkIV or 1500 Spitfire. This with a larger fromt anti-sway bar will provide enhanced handling and turning; /html/spitfires/1998-05/msg00179.html (7,486 bytes)
3. Re: Leaf spring (score: 1): Author: Paul <compubbs@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 18:05:08 -0300; I'm thinking of buying a new leaf spring, so while I'm at it I might as well buy the one for the mk4/1500. So you changed only the leaf spring and front torsion bar and found it much better than orig; /html/spitfires/1998-05/msg00186.html (8,276 bytes)
4. Re: Leaf spring (score: 1): Author: Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 14:18:44 -0700; ** Paul, I'm afraid not, that's just one of those characteristics of the (sagging) transverse spring arraignment. By the way, last time I checked, you can't buy the entire spring assy, even though i; /html/spitfires/1998-05/msg00188.html (8,331 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]