- 1. Re: Integra Type R's (score: 1)
- Author: TeamZ3@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 17:16:19 EST
- I guess since we don't have anything new to whine about we have to revert back to the misguided whinings of old. Since this subject is potentially a dead horse, should we continue to beat it? M Sipe
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00243.html (6,567 bytes)
- 2. Re: Integra Type R's (score: 1)
- Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 15:29:45 -0700
- Point well taken Mr. Sipe. (omigod! Did I just agree with Mark?) I'll refrain from any further wastes of time on the subject. I'm sure CHuck just wanted to stir some traffic on the list, and kindling
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00244.html (7,259 bytes)
- 3. Re: Integra Type R's (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 16:31:57 -0600
- == Ooh ooh please, I wanna watch. Huh, can I, can I? See you on course. Eric Linnhoff in KC '98 Neon R/T <eric10mm@qni.com> Take a ton of bolt and steel A whole lotta sweat, a set of wheels.....On t
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00245.html (7,164 bytes)
- 4. Re: Integra Type R's (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 22:32:03 EST
- << I guess since we don't have anything new to whine about we have to revert back to the misguided whinings of old. Since this subject is potentially a dead horse, should we continue to beat it? Why
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00278.html (6,990 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu