Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Induction\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Induction\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Induction question (score: 1): Author: "Pete W" <pete@squidlydid.freeserve.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 22:58:32 +0100; I have a 3.5 V8 from an SD1 in my TR7 which I plan to rebuild next winter. I intend to fit a fast road cam, Vitesse valves and give the internals a good polish etc but I am unsure which way to go wi; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-04/msg00005.html (7,504 bytes)
2. Re: Induction question (score: 1): Author: "James J." <m1garand@speakeasy.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:39:21 -0400; If it doesn't frighten you, always go with EFI. With an aftermarket computer, you can make a big-cam idle like a small cam, increase your M.P.G and a host of other improvements. That's my 2 HP, James; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-04/msg00006.html (7,960 bytes)
3. Re: Induction question (score: 1): Author: Richard Barrington <richard@freedomwigs.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 15:05:48 +1200; I'd say that injection is ultimately "better", but don't forget about the extras like high pressure fuel pump, lines, and tuning (eg, recoding the ECU to suit your motor). FWIW, a brand new Offenhau; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-04/msg00007.html (8,240 bytes)
4. Re: Induction question (score: 1): Author: "jon axt" <vonaxt@pacifier.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:16:16 -0700; I fit a Ford Mustang EFI (first 1989, then 1995) to a 215 Olds and then a 4.2 rover and it works great. The Ford EECIV has very good adaptive capabilities, and Mustang people find that they can insta; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-04/msg00008.html (7,720 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]