Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hydraulic\s+roller\s+camshafts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hydraulic\s+roller\s+camshafts\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Hydraulic roller camshafts (score: 1): Author: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 19:00:24 +1100; Thanks Dan, Paul Rakich also sent some info off-list. Now Paul had posted this to the list earlier but I didn't receive it. I don't know why but I don't receive every post to the list. Regards, Ron B; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-03/msg00000.html (6,262 bytes)
2. Re: Hydraulic roller camshafts (score: 1): Author: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@huntnet.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:22:38 -0600; Paul, I have recently been sniffing around in the area of roller lifters and am told by people that I trust that the lifter bores are too short to allow use of currently available roller lifters. Tel; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-02/msg00056.html (11,341 bytes)
3. Re: Hydraulic roller camshafts (score: 1): Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@q1.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:00:56 -0500; the lifter bore in the block is too short for roller rockers. whent he factory (group 44) ran, they used roller lifters but with a radical cam/lifter design. the lifter fit down over the cam lobe and; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-02/msg00057.html (12,564 bytes)
4. RE: Hydraulic roller camshafts (score: 1): Author: "Jones, Daniel C" <Daniel.Jones@MW.Boeing.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:10:34 -0600; cams suspect performance Hydraulic roller cams and lifters have drawbacks as well. Besides cost (typically 3+ times as much for an aftermarket conversion kit), they are considerably heavier and requ; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-02/msg00058.html (10,133 bytes)
5. RE: Hydraulic roller camshafts (score: 1): Author: "Jones, Daniel C" <Daniel.Jones@MW.Boeing.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:51:16 -0600; with a Flat tappet cam lobes will wear prematurely if not broken in properly, which takes some time and expense. A roller cam requires no break in so doesn't have this problem. That's the big driver; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-02/msg00062.html (10,695 bytes)
6. Re: Hydraulic roller camshafts (score: 1): Author: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 19:26:16 +1100; I seem to recall that there is an Australian manufacture of roller rockers for Rover V8s. I've just had a flick through (Austalian) Street Machine and I think they are made by Yella Terra. Most model; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-02/msg00066.html (7,877 bytes)
7. Re: Hydraulic roller camshafts (score: 1): Author: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 21:58:29 +1100; Ah yes. I had a look on their web site and they do make stuff for the Olds, Rover V8 etc. I'm just not quite sure what they make 8-) for the Rover. Ron Beckett rockers for phone; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-02/msg00073.html (8,432 bytes)
8. RE: Hydraulic roller camshafts (score: 1): Author: "Jones, Daniel C" <Daniel.Jones@MW.Boeing.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 09:31:47 -0600; Just to make sure we are all on the same page, there are roller rockers and there are roller lifters. Two separate items. Dan Jones; /html/buick-rover-v8/2000-02/msg00078.html (7,160 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]