Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hot\s+Stock\s+Cars\s+in\s+2002\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: "Grantz, Sherry" <Sherry.Grantz@Aspect.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:37:11 -0700
Now that the proposed Stock classifications are printed in Fast Track any speculation on what The Hot Car for each class will be? Sherry
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00467.html (7,522 bytes)

2. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:13:53 EDT
Okay, I'll take a stab at it... SS -- Corvette Z06 Maybe BMW M3 (E46), only because BMWs are sometimes better than they look on paper. AS -- Boxster S Later (after the gearbox change) NSX (I always t
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00476.html (8,150 bytes)

3. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:33:46 -0700
the NSX is an a-stock car? hell even i could beat andy in one of those if he's in a crummy boxster. or does it have some terrible problem? awesome, my probe has a shot again at GS. the 'viggen' i th
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00478.html (9,866 bytes)

4. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:54:46 EDT
It's in SS thru '01. Early cars had poor gear spacing between 1 and 2. I want to say it was solved in '94 or '95. No one has seriously autocrossed one, that I know of... Yeah, I picked the MX-6, but
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00481.html (8,381 bytes)

5. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:05:42 -0700
i thought that was mostly because mazda had more contingency money. probe has 16x7 in wheels compared to 15x6.5 on the mx-sucks. oh i mean mx-6 neon is lighter than both. -james ex-president, Bay Ar
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00482.html (9,409 bytes)

6. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:12:58 -0700
You honestly think the Miata will be a competitor? My take is it's good enough to trophy at the National level, but not good enough to win. I think Andy H. is an anomaly, frankly :) Scot '91 CS Miata
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00483.html (8,686 bytes)

7. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:17:45 -0700
mx-6 The MX-6 is also a 3-box body, which tends to be stiffer (and lighter) than a hatchback. It might be enough to overcome the disadvantage of narrower wheels. Yup. And we all know what lightness d
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00485.html (9,022 bytes)

8. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@idsfa.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:49:02 -0700
Makes it easier to get airborne at Candlestick? :-P James, there was a "ski jump" event early this season. "Flying Miatas" may come from Colorado, but San Francisco is definitely the home of flying A
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00486.html (8,641 bytes)

9. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 02:19:40 EDT
All you have to do to avoid it is go down to the end before going to the other side of the lot. It's really very simple. Next event chair who goes over the hump is going to get his course changed...
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00489.html (8,580 bytes)

10. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony Tabacco" <atabacco@california.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 07:46:02 -0700
Charlie, I remember that Keith Hearn designed a course that went over the bump at a really shallow angle, almost parallel to it that wasn't unsafe. Sort of like rolling over an ocean wave. Fun. Tony
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00493.html (8,731 bytes)

11. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: craig boyle <craig_autox@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
If my geography is correct, the last 3COM event used the hump very creatively as a nascar-banked-turn. This worked really well. Craig Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00494.html (9,384 bytes)

12. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: craig boyle <craig_autox@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
The whole thing's a conspiracy between Solotime and the SCCA to get us all to buy new magnetics! ;-) I vote we have a big magnetic-swap pizza-party at the end of the last slush event! Anyone got some
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00498.html (9,282 bytes)

13. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: Dougie360@aol.com
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:52:01 EDT
<< awesome, my probe has a shot again at GS. the 'viggen' i thought went 'wiggen' with torque steer galore. okay, have to jump in and defend my beloved Viggen. It's not really "torque steer" or else
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00499.html (9,275 bytes)

14. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: Andy McKee <andrewmckee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
The MX-6 is a better autox car than the Probe. It's lighter (by quite a bit), the 15" wheels allow a shorter tire for gearing, and the generally softer suspension has less push/wheelspin issues than
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00500.html (11,064 bytes)

15. RE: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" <PETER.THANA@ROCHE.COM>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:05:09 -0700
As it's currently written, I'd have to say: SS: Duh... AS: Boxster S, C4 Vette BS: Boxster CS: M2 Miata Sport, MR2 Spyder DS: E30 BMW M3 ES: 2nd gen MR2, 1.6 Miata FS: Camaro, Firebird GS: '91 BMW 31
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00504.html (9,678 bytes)

16. RE: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:41:11 -0700
Brake assist sucks. My wife's GS430 has it and we both dislike the way the brakes feel. It's super-sensitive and the pedal is so light there is very little "feel" to the brakes at all. And to make ma
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00505.html (10,809 bytes)

17. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: Andy McKee <andrewmckee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
SS - *Z06*, M3 owners better hope somebody good develops one, gets their ass kicked and the car maybe moves down a class AS - *Boxster S* is overall winner if it stays there, C4 and S2K's will be com
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00506.html (10,913 bytes)

18. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: Andy McKee <andrewmckee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00507.html (11,692 bytes)

19. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:07:43 -0700
hey andy, just checking to see if you were still reading the ba list :-) hehe -james bit), usually mx-6 2. I autocrossed went usually
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00508.html (11,638 bytes)

20. Re: Hot Stock Cars in 2002 (score: 1)
Author: craig boyle <craig_autox@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
So you don't see a Miata winning any stock class? How long could the SCCA let that situation continue with so many Miatae out there? I like the Starion here, just hope someone kind find one that runs
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00511.html (9,075 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu