Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Has\s+anyone\s+done\s+a\s+SR\s+2\.0\s+DET\s+in\s+an\s+early\s+roadster\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Has\s+anyone\s+done\s+a\s+SR\s+2\.0\s+DET\s+in\s+an\s+early\s+roadster\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Has anyone done a SR 2.0 DET in an early roadster? (score: 1): Author: BARTERDUDE@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:40:54 EST; Have potential opportunity to make my 64 Fairlady whole with a conversion to a SR 20 DET, but I am concerned about the length of the transmission. Also, need to update the brakes from drum to disk br; /html/datsun-roadsters/2005-11/msg00289.html (7,472 bytes)
2. Re: Has anyone done a SR 2.0 DET in an early roadster? (score: 1): Author: michaelspreadbury@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:06:31 +0000; A 1500 is probably not the best of donor cars for an engine swap conversion. The brakes, positive ground wiring system, instruments, narrow fenders and accompanying small wheels and tires, and small; /html/datsun-roadsters/2005-11/msg00290.html (9,380 bytes)
3. Re: Has anyone done a SR 2.0 DET in an early roadster? (score: 1): Author: "Gerardo Magana" <gerardomagana@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:13:35 -0800; Gary, It can be done, but the transmission needs to have the hole for the shifter possibly modified as it may come out in a different place. I have already done the conversion on my 1500, I placed di; /html/datsun-roadsters/2005-11/msg00291.html (8,240 bytes)
4. Re: Has anyone done a SR 2.0 DET in an early roadster? (score: 1): Author: Dan Zubkoff <zubkoff@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:44:10 -0800 (PST); It is true a new shift hole will need to be cut...but since the 64 1500 doesn't have a center console covering the transmission tunnel (like the 1600/2000) it shouldn't be too much of a big deal. Jus; /html/datsun-roadsters/2005-11/msg00293.html (7,643 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]