Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Great\s+fuel\s+mileage\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Great\s+fuel\s+mileage\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 15:59:54 -0400; Okay, so what would cause this? Bob and I always use almost exactly a gallon of fuel per day at big events. That's two drivers, three runs each, perhaps a rerun here and there, driving around the pit; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00000.html (8,943 bytes)
2. Re: Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 21:34:29 -0400; Mark, It always scares the $h!! out of me to even think about reving an unloaded engine to the rev limiter. So, before you do that: What kind of rev limiter? If it is a microdynamics, Pegasus can che; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00001.html (9,864 bytes)
3. Re: Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 22:33:18 -0400; Yeah, me too. But is it actually worse for the engine to rev it up unloaded than it us to rev it up under load? It is a Microdynamics. I figure maybe under years of vibration maybe the potentiometer; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00002.html (11,493 bytes)
4. Re: Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Schelling or Kate Hughes" <brholler@eznet.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 00:06:46 -0400; unloaded If you are to believe the owner's manual for the 84 Honda VF500F I used to have it is. It redlined at 12,000 RPM, but the manual cautioned to rev to no more than 8,000 (IIRC) if the engine w; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00004.html (8,735 bytes)
5. Re: Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: Jim and Rose Ann Garry <garryj@localnet.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 15:37:50 -0400; Mark Sirota wrote: Jim took durometer readings, but I don't know what they My new 25As were about 3 to 4 durometer points lower than yours, which in turn were about the same as Kent's brand new Goody; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00005.html (7,773 bytes)
6. Re: Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 15:01:18 -0400; --On Monday, June 03, 2002 10:33 PM -0400 Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org> As suggested, I've gone through the ignition system looking for anything that looks wrong, but everything looks fine -- most th; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00018.html (9,076 bytes)
7. Re: Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 16:12:10 -0400; Mark, Normally "bounce" in a points ignition is from points that don't have a strong enough spring. If the points are NOT the "Heavy Duty" Bosch points sold by Pegasus, etc then MAYBE the spring is n; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00019.html (9,842 bytes)
8. Re: Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 18:07:31 -0400; Thanks for all your continued help and suggestions! Dick's thought of checking the distributor shaft for play may have turned something up -- there is some play. How much play is there allowed to be?; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00022.html (8,142 bytes)
9. Re: Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 18:29:22 -0400; Mark, I don't know any details about the shaft "side play" limits. However, if the battery won't fully charge (assuming it used to) I recommend a new battery first! I've heard MANY tales of misfires; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00023.html (9,656 bytes)
10. Re: Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: "gvav27" <gvav27@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 07:49:33 -0400; One of the justifications for getting electronic ignition approved for FF was that they are less sensitive than points to distributor wear. If you think you have any wear in the distributor you shou; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00024.html (8,743 bytes)
11. Re: Great fuel mileage? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 11:50:13 -0400; According to Hawker/Odyssey, it's possible that a "bad" charger can do longterm damage to a battery. But in this case, it's clear that the problem is the charger -- it doesn't generate high enough vo; /html/autox-cm/2002-06/msg00025.html (8,266 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]