Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*G\s+forces\s+in\s+AM\s+cars\s+$was\:\s+Why\s+concrete\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*G\s+forces\s+in\s+AM\s+cars\s+$was\:\s+Why\s+concrete\?$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. G forces in AM cars (was: Why concrete?) (score: 1): Author: jeff@winchell.com; Date: 17 Aug 2001 12:27:56 -0700; The Phantom has measured 3gs before (I think at Topeka?) and had even higher forces when running higher speeds at a Hill Climb (the wing support was getting torn till they changed it's angle of atta; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00293.html (7,598 bytes)
2. G forces in AM cars (was: Why concrete?) (score: 1): Author: jeff@winchell.com; Date: 17 Aug 2001 12:28:03 -0700; The Phantom has measured 3gs before (I think at Topeka?) and had even higher forces when running higher speeds at a Hill Climb (the wing support was getting torn till they changed it's angle of atta; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00294.html (7,654 bytes)
3. Re: G forces in AM cars (was: Why concrete?) (score: 1): Author: jeff@winchell.com; Date: 17 Aug 2001 19:42:08 -0700; OK. That makes sense. In that case, the only data point I have is when Joe Cheng said he's measured 1100 lbs of downforce on his 700 lb car, so does that make it 2.5 G's? Plus that was before he did; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00304.html (7,632 bytes)
4. Re: G forces in AM cars (was: Why concrete?) (score: 1): Author: Stefanv@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:51:29 EDT; Please, at what speed was the 1100 lbs of downforce measured? -STEFAN ...building an A-mod <SNIP> /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@a; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00329.html (7,179 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]