Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Future\s+FoT\s+Challenge\s+Race\-A\s+Proposal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Future\s+FoT\s+Challenge\s+Race\-A\s+Proposal\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:49:17 EDT; The trend is back to kinder, gentler, lower cost events (in my view). Thinking to the future, may I propose a concept for a future event. A low cost, user friendly, non-'festival' event, with plenty; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00199.html (7,916 bytes)
2. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: Gasket Works USA <gasket.works@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:47:08 -0500; Are you thinking that the fot and company become its own one time one event sanctioning group? I'm thinking to tag along with another smaller and receptive VMC sanctioning body and look for a fun/fri; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00200.html (9,285 bytes)
3. RE: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:00:03 -0700; Thunderhill is a very cool track, but it's a long way to anywhere--that's why the SCCA built it there. I doubt there will ever be a noise complaint. It's also some of the most perfect pavement I've e; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00201.html (10,366 bytes)
4. RE: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Barr, Scott" <sbarr@mccarty-law.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:36:31 -0500; I'm sure everyone will suggest his or her favorite track in his or her back yard, but Blackhawk Farms might fit the bill nicely. It's an hour or so from Chicago. It's in the middle of the country. Th; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00202.html (10,793 bytes)
5. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: Henry Frye <henry@henryfrye.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:56:47 -0400; Great idea, Joe! I think it would be easier to tag along with some sanctioning body's existing event, rather than make our own. I don't think we have the desire, organization or cash to pull off an e; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00203.html (9,485 bytes)
6. RE: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Don Marshall" <marshall@nefcom.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:02:51 -0400; << The trend is back to kinder, gentler, lower cost events (in my view). Thinking to the future, may I propose a concept for a future event. A low cost, user friendly, non-'festival' event, with plen; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00205.html (8,546 bytes)
7. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:31:06 EDT; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00206.html (8,250 bytes)
8. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: Mike Jackson <grandwazoo@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:20:14 -0400; I'll try to support FoT gatherings at events that are not already oversubscribed, and that I have a shot at being able to tow to. With acknowledgement that I am a part time race organizer but who is; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00207.html (10,523 bytes)
9. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Bradakis" <mjb@utahblues.org>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:29:03 -0600; Gee, that sounds just like me and IVR. But I won't let that stop me, we're planning on having a race this weekend regardless. Could be fun, a little cold here in the mountains, but fun. As for next; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00209.html (8,835 bytes)
10. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: KLynch7589@aol.com; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:01:42 EDT; Unless of course, you're pulling from the West... Go Socks !! (sorry Fred...:-) K Lynch RMVR Be an organ donor!; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00210.html (8,579 bytes)
11. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Fred & Mary Hodgson" <stlnyc@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:51:33 -0600; I don't have any idea what track rent is, but Heartland in Topeka is a helluva track & I believe it's in SVRA territory. It's at least fairly central. Fred Hodgson FoT, The trend is back to kinder,; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00211.html (9,036 bytes)
12. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: William G Rosenbach <wgrosenbach@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:50:06 -0600; If the idea is a national event, why not a central location? There is a real nice facility in the middle of America that has been getting improvements recently, has various configurations, and is pre; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00213.html (9,357 bytes)
13. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:43:24 -0700; helluva low for; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00216.html (9,441 bytes)
14. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: "BOB KRAMER" <rkramer3@austin.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:59:44 -0500; Do any vintage groups run an event there? Bob Kramer rkramer3@austin.rr.com -- Original Message -- From: "William G Rosenbach" <wgrosenbach@juno.com> To: <KLynch7589@aol.com> Cc: <N197TR4@cs.com>; <m; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00217.html (9,800 bytes)
15. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:40:26 -0400 (EDT); Kool... so if the concrete at Forbes Field breaks up any worse, the Solo program can move over there to have the nationals. I drove around the access roads to Heartland Park, Topeka a couple of times; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00228.html (8,468 bytes)
16. Re: Future FoT Challenge Race-A Proposal (score: 1): Author: William G Rosenbach <wgrosenbach@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:22:04 -0600; The finest patch of concrete I've ever seen is in Salina, KS. It was in perfect condition, very aggressive and had no sections spalling that I could find. It's a shame SCCA ever moved the Solo=II Nat; /html/fot/2004-10/msg00241.html (9,342 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]