- 1. End of The MGB (score: 1)
- Author: John Steunenberg <steuny@nornet.on.ca>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 19:09:13 -0500
- Dear fellow list readers Could I get some help on the real reason that British Leyland stopped production of our favorite LBC the MGB, I have heard many versions of the story but I would like to know
- /html/mgs/1996-11/msg01102.html (6,752 bytes)
- 2. Re: End of The MGB (score: 1)
- Author: Dan Barnes <dabarnes@osiris.ac.hmc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 21:13:18 -0800 (PST)
- The MGB was obsolete by the mid-sixties. Its front suspension was brilliant when Issigonis designed it in 1938, but was no longer adequate. It's rear suspension was used by American cars for many yea
- /html/mgs/1996-11/msg01118.html (8,886 bytes)
- 3. Re: End of The MGB (score: 1)
- Author: OSCALETA99@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 01:11:35 -0500
- In a nutshell, I paraphrase Lindsay Porter - guru to many of us and the person most responsible for my cars not being heaps of primed or oily parts!!!! After "ruining" the engine and performance with
- /html/mgs/1996-11/msg01123.html (7,577 bytes)
- 4. Re: End of The MGB (score: 1)
- Author: bleckstein@monmouth.com
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 08:53:16 -0500 (EST)
- Mike
- /html/mgs/1996-11/msg01142.html (7,160 bytes)
- 5. Re: End of The MGB (score: 1)
- Author: "A. B. Bonds" <ab@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>
- Date: 19 Nov 1996 08:36:24 -0600
- This would take several pages. It is offered in a number of histories of MG. IMHO, the most authoritative of these is MG by McComb. From this and other sources it would appear that a primary factor w
- /html/mgs/1996-11/msg01145.html (7,258 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu