- 1. Do we still need the ba-autox mailing list? (score: 1)
- Author: "Viet-Tam Luu" <viettamluu@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:40:28 -0700
- The ba-autox mailing list has served us well but I wonder if it's not time to think about simply supplanting it with the online forum format, for example baautox.com. I won't go into the pros and con
- /html/ba-autox/2006-05/msg00041.html (8,111 bytes)
- 2. Re: Do we still need the ba-autox mailing list? (score: 1)
- Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:03:49 -0700
- Funny that you should use the mailing list rather than the forum to raise the issue! The forum is not as effective for important announcements. You have to actively go to the forum and look for somet
- /html/ba-autox/2006-05/msg00042.html (8,905 bytes)
- 3. Re: Do we still need the ba-autox mailing list? (score: 1)
- Author: "Viet-Tam Luu" <viettamluu@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:23:12 -0700
- I meant mainly that the mailing list has some "official" status with regards to posting of some SCCA-related announcements, etc. Maybe I'll put forth a motion tomorrow to have such announcements post
- /html/ba-autox/2006-05/msg00046.html (9,456 bytes)
- 4. Re: Do we still need the ba-autox mailing list? (score: 1)
- Author: "Bruce Corcoran" <BruceCorcoran@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:15:33 -0700
- Send them all to the mailing list then, so the other 2/3's will sign up, I personally don't like to hunt through a forum to find the important information. It is just so much easier, you can always g
- /html/ba-autox/2006-05/msg00047.html (9,160 bytes)
- 5. Re: Do we still need the ba-autox mailing list? (score: 1)
- Author: Johann Schubert <jes@rx7.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:52:45 -0700
- I subscribe to various mailing lists and am a member of a few forums... I find the forums to be incredibly difficult to deal with, especially when trying to get questions answered that haven't alread
- /html/ba-autox/2006-05/msg00048.html (8,859 bytes)
- 6. Re: Do we still need the ba-autox mailing list? (score: 1)
- Author: "Viet-Tam Luu" <viettamluu@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:04:38 -0700
- I prefer the forum format myself, where I can go and skim over new messages at my leisure (rather than having them "pushed" into my E-mail in-box), follow up one ones that interest me, ignore others.
- /html/ba-autox/2006-05/msg00049.html (9,559 bytes)
- 7. Re: Do we still need the ba-autox mailing list? (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Stevens" <autox@pursued-with.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
- Yes, we get it. You prefer forums for a variety of reasons, but you won't go into the pros and cons of either format. (rolls eyes) KeS
- /html/ba-autox/2006-05/msg00053.html (8,852 bytes)
- 8. Re: Do we still need the ba-autox mailing list? (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott & Charlotte Miller" <bimmerdogs@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:39:55 -0700
- Mailing lists bring information to me. Message boards require me to go to them. I'm lazy and would rather have the info continue to come to me. Not that my opinion means anything here. Scott Miller
- /html/ba-autox/2006-05/msg00054.html (8,591 bytes)
- 9. Re: Do we still need the ba-autox mailing list? (score: 1)
- Author: "Viet-Tam Luu" <viettamluu@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:11:39 -0700
- Okay, I get it. Floating the question on this mailing list was obviously a waste of time. (rolls eyes right back at you)
- /html/ba-autox/2006-05/msg00055.html (8,018 bytes)
- 10. Do we still need the ba-autox mailing list? (score: 1)
- Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:31:40 -0400
- Message text written by "Viet-Tam Luu" "I won't go into the pros and cons of either format (though others are welcome to) but I think the online forum has many advantages over the mailing list, and f
- /html/ba-autox/2006-05/msg00056.html (8,080 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu