Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DC\s+gets\s+tired\s+of\s+SCCA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DC\s+gets\s+tired\s+of\s+SCCA\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Pat MacAvoy <patmac@tridelta.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 13:07:02 -0400 (EDT); Hi All, I just got a letter in the mail today, that sez that DC (chrysler) is dropping all support of SCCA-sanctioned events. This means Solo, too (or would that be Solo2?). :-) This is a result of w; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00562.html (8,033 bytes)
2. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoult" <stevehoult@home.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 13:37:52 -0500; Remember that it wasn't DC that built the Neon, they just inherited it. While Chrysler may have seen the wisdom of putting cheap racers in the average schmo's hands, Daimler doesn't. Look at what ra; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00568.html (8,500 bytes)
3. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 12:51:29 -0700; Wow. So does this mean that this is the last year of the Neon Super Solo? And does this mean that D-Spec will once again become D-Stock? Wow. Well, they did rather stretch the rules to make the Neon; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00569.html (9,177 bytes)
4. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Pat MacAvoy <patmac@tridelta.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:46:37 -0400 (EDT); Very good point. Grassroots racing hasn't been anything of interest for them, from what I know. patmac Pat MacAvoy a.k.a. konekiller@tridelta.com 84 CS RX7 GSL-SE (for sale, see http://www.suite224.; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00577.html (9,011 bytes)
5. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 14:22:02 -0700; The RX-7's are agreeably the hot car for the class right now, but look at the national level class populations. B-stock and D-stock are one marque classes right now. SS still has a nice variety. Not; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00578.html (12,977 bytes)
6. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Jason Bowles <jbowles@carol.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 16:37:30 -0400; Why does everyone thing that the ACR is some special package like the SS for Camaro? You could do the same thing with the R/T or any of the 95-96 Sport Coupes or Sport Sedans. Only difference would b; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00579.html (8,948 bytes)
7. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 14:57:57 -0700; In my eyes eyes, for showroom stock, it is. Showroom stock requires a STOCK car. Stock alignment and stock SHOCKS. To my knowledge the ACR comes with much better shocks than the non ACR model. Same g; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00581.html (8,893 bytes)
8. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Jason Bowles <jbowles@carol.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 16:58:41 -0400; This is true I was looking at that portion from a solo-II where any strut can be used. You can get any of those cars with the same options as an ACR. minus the larger hubs and koni struts or better a; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00583.html (9,042 bytes)
9. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 16:55:37 -0700; [snip] Hey, I just realized something here. This means that while SoloII keeps it's contingency money for Nationals this year. DC will have dropped their program by the time Runoffs occur. Maybe they; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00598.html (8,998 bytes)
10. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Lloyd" <jslz3@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 23:11:11 GMT; O.B. autox content. Where can SSB or SSC cars compete in autocross nowadays? Not stock, they've got to go either to SP or ST. And that just plain sucks. We all knew that an SSB Miata would not be the; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00601.html (8,643 bytes)
11. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 18:17:33 -0600; Not anymore. That rule seemingly has not been examined since trunk kits were instituted in SS. I've talked with a couple SEB members and Howard about this. While as of yet I have no "official" ruling; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00605.html (9,772 bytes)
12. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Loren Williams <Loren@kscable.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 20:17:14 -0500; On the bright side: At least D Stock might get more interesting. (sorry, someone had to say it) -- Loren Williams | Homepage - http://www2.southwind.net/~lsw '94 Saturn SC2 | Wichita Region SCCA - ht; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00613.html (8,691 bytes)
13. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:23:08 -0500; Of course not. Of course. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA Lotus Europa, VW Quantum Syncro, Chev Suburban LOON, TCVWC, MAC pethier@isd.net http://www.visi.com/mac/; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00623.html (8,675 bytes)
14. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:32:11 -0500; Nonsense. The first BATCH (not year) of Neon ACR cars were available to any SCCA member. The club was afraid that anyone who wanted one for autocross or racing might not be able to get one of the fir; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00624.html (9,142 bytes)
15. RE: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Alan Pozner <AlanP@identicard.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 08:47:20 -0400; Showroom Stock cars in equivalent Stock class: Without trunk kit yes. With trunk kit no. Regards, Alan Pozner '93 ES delSol On Monday, August 16, 1999 7:11 PM, Jeff Lloyd [SMTP:jslz3@hotmail.com] wro; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00632.html (8,901 bytes)
16. RE: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Phil Osborne <posborne@minuteman-ups.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 08:21:08 -0500; So, maybe someone can explain to me what is so wrong with this picture...The Neon has been dominant when driven by great drivers in money paying events, but it has also been dominant by not so great; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00636.html (9,436 bytes)
17. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 10:53:20 -0700; Ok. Well I was then working under some misinformation provided to me. My apologies for going astray. That does change things a little. Nonetheless, the cars seem to have been deliberately targeted to; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00651.html (8,947 bytes)
18. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 10:55:20 -0700; And what Showroom stock cars w/o trunk kits are competitive in Showroom stock? Besides the ACR Neon and Miata R that is. A little sarcasm there, but really, are there any other cars in Showroom stock; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00652.html (8,158 bytes)
19. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: Derek Engelhaupt <derekengelhaupt@rocketmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 11:27:46 -0700 (PDT); Showroom there, two A Miata doesn't HAVE to be an 'R' to be competative... ;) No bias here, of course. == Derek Engelhaupt '97 White Mazda Miata St. Paul, MN Until you make peace with who you are, y; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00662.html (8,719 bytes)
20. Re: DC gets tired of SCCA (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:32:30 -0500; Of COURSE they were deliberately targeted towards competition. I don't see that that has to necessarily be a bad thing. It would be a very bad thing for the sport if: [The cars were very expensive o; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00683.html (8,711 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]