- 1. Re: Cost for MGBGT (long-ish response) (score: 1)
- Author: RJohn50603@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 10:48:18 EDT
- << This car has cost me less to own and operate than any other car we have owned. It is used regularly and while it is nothing special I enjoy the occasional wink or wave from a 40 or 50 year old mat
- /html/mgs/1999-07/msg00141.html (6,794 bytes)
- 2. Cost for MGBGT (long-ish response) (score: 1)
- Author: Florrie & Allen Bachelder <bachldrs@swva.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:09:58 -0400
- -- I whole-heartedly endorse Drew's post with one qualification: this is not the first time I've read of 80# oil pressure on this list - but after 15 years of daily driving in several B's - three wit
- /html/mgs/1999-06/msg01145.html (11,035 bytes)
- 3. Re: Cost for MGBGT (long-ish response) (score: 1)
- Author: Pointparty@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:23:25 EDT
- Thanks for brilliantly and completely expressing my sentiments. My 71 GT has been a dependable driver for over 15 years that I've owned it and for the PO (a good guy) since new. Mine has 100K plus mi
- /html/mgs/1999-06/msg01172.html (7,120 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu