Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cordless\s+Phones\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cordless\s+Phones\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Cordless Phones (score: 1): Author: "Ronald Olds" <tr6@pipeline.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 05:34:48 -0500; I need to replace a cordless phone and am total confused about what type to get. What is the difference between 900MHz analog, 2.4 MHz and 5.8 MHz digital? What is recommended for the best type? On t; /html/shop-talk/2004-09/msg00068.html (7,277 bytes)
2. Re: Cordless Phones (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 05:41:45 -0500; Ron I'm in the same position.... both here and in my business.... looking forward to an answer to this one... K; /html/shop-talk/2004-09/msg00069.html (7,582 bytes)
3. Re: Cordless Phones (score: 1): Author: Eric@megageek.com; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:59:52 -0400; Ok, I'm no expert, but I'll give you my 2 cents about what I know. First off, it seems that we are at a limit of radio commutation via wireless means without licenses. Most wireless devices are using; /html/shop-talk/2004-09/msg00070.html (10,831 bytes)
4. Re: Cordless Phones (score: 1): Author: "Karl Vacek" <KVacek@Ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:02:13 -0500; FWIW, my admittedly limited testing showed that 3 different 2.4 GHz models had poor range compared to the far-cheaper 900 MHz ones. And there's a limitation on proximity of the base station and poor; /html/shop-talk/2004-09/msg00071.html (7,896 bytes)
5. Re: Cordless Phones (score: 1): Author: Peter Murray <pete@partnercomm.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:25:12 -0400 (EDT); All cordless phones and similar 'you own the system' units are using unlicensed spectrum, whether 900 MHz, 2.4 GHz or 5.8 GHz. The main difference is power limits in the band and the characteristics; /html/shop-talk/2004-09/msg00072.html (10,121 bytes)
6. RE: Cordless Phones (score: 1): Author: "Mike Frerichs" <frerichs@tconl.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:36:37 -0500; Here's my data point for you: I used to have a Sony 900 MHz digital spread spectrum phone with which I could go outside, across the street, and most of the way around to the back of my neighbor's hou; /html/shop-talk/2004-09/msg00101.html (7,838 bytes)
7. Re: Cordless Phones (score: 1): Author: "Mark and Susan Miller" <marknsuz@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:49:37 -0700; My input: I've had a few different 900 and 49mhz phones over the years and then bought a "good" 2.4GHZ base station/multiple handset one from Siemen's, their Gigaset. It was great except for the mino; /html/shop-talk/2004-09/msg00102.html (8,498 bytes)
8. Re: Cordless Phones (score: 1): Author: "Karl Vacek" <KVacek@Ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:11:40 -0500; OK - this is a really old thread, but I have a related question. What is the advantage of buying a base station that takes more than one handset, versus just buying several single wireless phones? We; /html/shop-talk/2004-09/msg00182.html (7,518 bytes)
9. Re: Cordless Phones (score: 1): Author: Paul Parkanzky <parkanz1@msu.edu>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:58:04 -0400; The advantage in my (old) house was that there were only two phone jacks and I wanted extensions in several places. With the multi-handset setups you can put a charging jack anywhere you want. You do; /html/shop-talk/2004-09/msg00183.html (8,080 bytes)
10. Re: Cordless Phones (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kradicke@wishboneclassics.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:18:51 -0400; handset, versus just buying An intercom system that works across the "expandable base / handset system" wheras, you cannot do that with individual phones all on the same line. Also the handsets that; /html/shop-talk/2004-09/msg00184.html (8,096 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]