Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chemistry\?\s+Was\:\s+SB42\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 09:02:14 -0700
Hi All, I'm not a Chemist, but I thought the level of pollutants produced by Unleaded fuel was considered more dangerous than those produced by leaded, because of the high level of carcinogenic aroma
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01695.html (8,590 bytes)

2. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 09:46:30 -0400
Hello Bill, you responded to my post - Well, I'm not a chemist either, but I work with a few of them here at a Toxic Hazard research lab, and from our discussions, it seems that the lead itself is th
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01708.html (9,451 bytes)

3. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:18:17 -0400
The strange thing is that I grew up in England in a house built in the 20's which had lead water pipes, and alkaline water, which dissolves lead. While I do not lay claim to be completely sane, since
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01756.html (10,900 bytes)

4. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:31:14 -0400
A lot of people drive without seatbelts and survive. A lot of people have unprotected sex and never catch anything. A lot of people walk out of casinos with more money than they walked in with. A lot
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01758.html (8,721 bytes)

5. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 19:43:54 -0500 (EST)
Bear in mind that some people are just less affected by some toxins. Also, if you used those substances when you were younger, your exposure may not have been long enough. Notice how some five-pack-a
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01760.html (11,658 bytes)

6. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 11:33:29 -0700
I think there's a point being missed here, Unless a Catalytic Converter is fitted to a vehicle, Unleaded fuel is proven to be MORE dangerous than Leaded. If a Catalytic Converter is fitted but driven
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01777.html (13,656 bytes)

7. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 08:09:45 -0700
I rememeber something from my college chemistry class that stated that "toxic" has to do with the level or amount of a particular chemical, not the chemical itself, i.e., a chemical isn't by definiti
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01787.html (8,026 bytes)

8. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 97 08:54:13 PDT
pressure. Oxygen?! I'll say the bloody stuff is toxic/lethal. Oxygen is the key ingredient of rust! Shane Ingate in San Diego
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01791.html (7,641 bytes)

9. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 12:12:25 -0400 "Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42" (Sep 26, 8:54am)
pressure. In light of the above, I submit the following: How Gullible Are We? A freshman at Eagle Rock Junior High won first prize at the Greater Idaho Falls Science Fair, April 26. He was attempting
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01793.html (9,396 bytes)

10. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 15:06:47 -0400
I think more sorely missed here is a scientific method towards problem solving. Consider your facts carefully, and don't leap to conclusions because they are convenient. It seems like everybody who w
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01804.html (9,354 bytes)

11. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 16:04:29 -0700
I agree that all the substances I mentioned in my note are toxic. However, my point was that government agencies have grossly overstated the danger of many of these things. I am totally convinced tha
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01810.html (8,992 bytes)

12. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 16:38:21 -0400
Much like the automotive press have greatly overstated the need for lead, and like the automotive public greatly overstate the need for horsepower anyways. Most arguments from both sides are absurd.
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01811.html (8,504 bytes)

13. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 19:40:46 GMT
I hope our UK friends don't get too upset about the lead thing. Trevor's right...we have been running without it forever and it doesn't seem to be causing any serious problems. Unleaded fuel has actu
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01844.html (9,081 bytes)

14. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 18:12:14 -0700
"Ammoco" was one of the high performance fuels of the sixties. My parents used only Ammoco in both their 55 Buick Century and (my favorite) my dads 1957 TR-3. I used it in my "souped-up" lawn mower.
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01854.html (10,298 bytes)

15. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 21:40:01 -0400
The measurment of octane has changed since then. They still don't make an equivalent of 102 octane though. -- George Richardson '57 TR3, TS15559L (getting ready to paint - and now on the web!) http:/
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01855.html (11,136 bytes)

16. Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 08:12:10 -0700
Unfortunately these numbers are skewed by the fact that lead was removed from several other common sources at about the same time, or a little before. One very prominent case is lead based paints in
/html/triumphs/1997-09/msg01894.html (10,746 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu