Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Calibrating\s+the\s+Cube\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Calibrating\s+the\s+Cube\.\.\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Calibrating the Cube... (score: 1): Author: HUOA@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 16:30:05 EDT; Sometimes I'll get a run that appears as if the cube wasn't correctly calibrated. Typically, the cube will not auto stop. When I look at the run afterwards I realize that the cube is getting a decel; /html/geez/1999-10/msg00010.html (7,733 bytes)
2. Re: Calibrating the Cube... (score: 1): Author: Todd Green <tag@cs.utah.edu>; Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 15:18:22 -0600; Hey all. Just used GEEZ for the first weekend at an Idaho/Utah "divisional". Lots to type up, no time to do it :( Very briefly, I assume everyone is using raw unadjusted data|ratings for their displ; /html/geez/1999-10/msg00011.html (7,685 bytes)
3. Re: Calibrating the Cube... (score: 1): Author: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 22:51:04 -0400; like a My understanding is that GEEZ usage is based on the numbers YOU generate as the high's under certain conditions and then makes sure you "keep" doing this. So, if you are consistently "slow", t; /html/geez/1999-10/msg00015.html (8,907 bytes)
4. Re: Calibrating the Cube... (score: 1): Author: Byron Short <bshort@AFSinc.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 11:09:32 -0700; When you hit "AutoStart", the Cube does a 1/2 second calibration right at that moment. In that 1/2 second, it sets it's "zero" position. If at that moment your car was on an uphill slant, the cube wo; /html/geez/1999-10/msg00017.html (10,314 bytes)
5. Re: Calibrating the Cube... (score: 1): Author: Byron Short <bshort@AFSinc.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 11:19:37 -0700; Don't kid yourself, Todd. All caveats about the ratings needing more tweaking aside, those are excellent scores. Most of us use the adjusted ratings most of the time, but there are exceptions. Especi; /html/geez/1999-10/msg00018.html (8,349 bytes)
6. Re: Calibrating the Cube... (score: 1): Author: Todd Green <tag@cs.utah.edu>; Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 11:58:44 -0600; I think that just about any journeyman autoxer can jerk the car to generate a high lateral load, and stomp on the gas and brakes to generate the long loads. I also doubt that anyone is going to tank; /html/geez/1999-10/msg00025.html (8,231 bytes)
7. Re: Calibrating the Cube... (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 14:12:34 -0400; You can't accurately compare different cars, or even believe these numbers. They are completely dependent on accurate settings of the roll and pitch angles (in degrees per g), and proper calibration; /html/geez/1999-10/msg00026.html (7,524 bytes)
8. Re: Calibrating the Cube... (score: 1): Author: Byron Short <bshort@AFSinc.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 11:53:01 -0700; Actually the *should* be pretty accurate. Folks that have access to a g.Analyst have found very consistent readings between G-Cube and G.Analyst. And you can verify readings of your cube on your desk; /html/geez/1999-10/msg00028.html (9,156 bytes)
9. Re: Calibrating the Cube... (score: 1): Author: Jeff Cashmore <cashmo@execpc.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 14:11:13 -0500; Todd, remember those numbers and compare them to your next event. Eventually you'll figure out a consistent range that each will hit. You can use these to tell if you're having a bad day or not. Obv; /html/geez/1999-10/msg00029.html (7,912 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]