Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Biggest\s+bang\s+for\s+the\s+buck\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Biggest\s+bang\s+for\s+the\s+buck\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Biggest bang for the buck? (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 07:38:29 -0800; Perhaps this goes without saying, but the stock muffler is a serious detriment to power and economy, and should be one of the very first things to do. In terms of bang for the buck, exhaust work is; /html/6pack/2006-02/msg00000.html (8,476 bytes)
2. Re: Biggest bang for the buck? (score: 1): Author: Jim Jones <jimjcmo@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 08:48:55 -0800 (PST); I would echo what Vance said about exhaust mods. The motor on my car has headers feeding into a single pipe extractor exhaust system. That in combination with K&N filters and retuning of the carbs ma; /html/6pack/2006-02/msg00001.html (7,136 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]