Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Big\s+Problem\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Big Problem (score: 1)
Author: epetrevich@relavis.com
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:00:00 -0500
Morning folks. I got a friend with a BIG problem on his hands. I have a friend that was getting ready to sell a property when he removed the oil tanks (there were 5 of them). When removed, 3 of the t
/html/shop-talk/2001-11/msg00128.html (7,733 bytes)

2. RE: Big Problem (score: 1)
Author: jmark.vanscoter@amd.com
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:43:53 -0600
When I had spilled some oil on my property one time I wanted to clean it up. So, I dug down, built a big bonfire and (essentially) cooked the earth clean. Soil with oil burns well. Also "fired" some
/html/shop-talk/2001-11/msg00129.html (8,258 bytes)

3. Re: Big Problem (score: 1)
Author: Mike Sloane <msloane@att.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:25:59 -0500
The EPA treats leaky oil tanks as if is a toxic super spill like the Love Canal or Exxon Valdez. The answer is that removal might not bankrupt him; it WILL bankrupt him. I wouldn't advise anyone to d
/html/shop-talk/2001-11/msg00131.html (8,841 bytes)

4. Re: Big Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jim Juhas <james.f.juhas@snet.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:10:05 -0500
My brother recently went through this with the removal of one tank, which as it turns out did not leak. He engaged a tank removal firm, with all the permits and such, to have the work done. I'll see
/html/shop-talk/2001-11/msg00135.html (8,571 bytes)

5. Re: Big Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Munroe" <brutusdog1@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:24:52 -0400
_________________________________________________________________ /// /// shop-talk@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with noth
/html/shop-talk/2001-11/msg00136.html (9,356 bytes)

6. Re: Big Problem (score: 1)
Author: JAGCRET <jagcret@home.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:54:44 -0500
Yep, BIG problems--maybe. As of December 1988, all (or just about all) states have adopted Underground Storage Tank (UST) regulations. They are very closely patterned after the federal regulations fo
/html/shop-talk/2001-11/msg00137.html (8,872 bytes)

7. Re: Big Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Munroe" <brutusdog1@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 22:15:05 -0400
I went through this process recently in assessing the value of a commercial property with a suspect soil condition. Two points: If you hire a professional soils engineer/consultant to do an assessme
/html/shop-talk/2001-11/msg00138.html (9,409 bytes)

8. Re: Big Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:28:58 -0600
Like many have mentioned there is a Time frame when all of this applies... the EPA decided ( through Court cases I'm sure) that they can not hold folks respondsible for damage done prior to the curre
/html/shop-talk/2001-11/msg00139.html (8,987 bytes)

9. Re: Big Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Nolan Penney" <npenney@mde.state.md.us>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 06:46:11 -0500
Can't give you simple answer because I don't know what state you're in. But I can tell you this, your message about possible illegal activities with a leaking underground storage tank was received in
/html/shop-talk/2001-11/msg00140.html (8,620 bytes)

10. Re: Big Problem (score: 1)
Author: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:12:52 -0800
Anonymous remailer info: http://www.andrebacard.com/remail.html /// /// shop-talk@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing
/html/shop-talk/2001-11/msg00141.html (8,093 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu