Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*April\s+FasTrack\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*April\s+FasTrack\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. April FasTrack (score: 1): Author: Steve <huronmountain@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:10:26 -0800 (PST); The April FasTrack is out and there are a couple of request for comment issues and rule additions that affect CM. The full text can be seen at <http://www.scca.com/news/tech/fastrack/04-04-fastrack.p; /html/autox-cm/2004-02/msg00011.html (8,905 bytes)
2. Re: April FasTrack (score: 1): Author: Tyson D Sawyer <tyson@j3.org>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:28:47 -0500; They recommended against it?!?! Damn! I guess I'll have to write a letter to the SEB quick! ;-) What is an FCS or SRCS? When reading the GCR's a bit little, I saw these TLA's and FLA's, but could not; /html/autox-cm/2004-02/msg00012.html (10,323 bytes)
3. Re: April FasTrack (score: 1): Author: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:06:14 -0500; FCS = Formula Category Specifications SRCS = Sports Racer Category Specifications Included (in the back) with the GCR in recent years. Required for CM, BM, FM cars for many years. Has the constructio; /html/autox-cm/2004-02/msg00013.html (7,901 bytes)
4. Re: April FasTrack (score: 1): Author: Tyson D Sawyer <tyson@j3.org>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:18:04 -0500; ...then I had better check that book to see if the super charger that Chuck put in is legal. He said that he wasn't sure but no one had ever protested him. ;-) Cheers! Ty -- Tyson D Sawyer 46CM '85 R; /html/autox-cm/2004-02/msg00014.html (8,208 bytes)
5. Re: April FasTrack (score: 1): Author: Steve <huronmountain@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:19:13 -0800 (PST); Hey now! :-) My own final reasoning on that one was that the FF2000 was probably the least expensive entry point into BM and they need the competitors more than CM. Also I feared that if the resultin; /html/autox-cm/2004-02/msg00015.html (10,197 bytes)
6. Re: April FasTrack (score: 1): Author: Tyson D Sawyer <tyson@j3.org>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:34:37 -0500; I did get a reply and "confirmation number". The core of my complaint was that either the FF2000 would be slowed enough to be uncompetitive so there was no point, or it would fundamentally change the; /html/autox-cm/2004-02/msg00016.html (8,781 bytes)
7. Re: April FasTrack (score: 1): Author: Steve <huronmountain@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:14:45 -0800 (PST); Dick was of course correct here, I said Formula Car Specifications which was wrong. Sorry for my confusion. Steve Elzinga __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection; /html/autox-cm/2004-02/msg00017.html (7,515 bytes)
8. Re: April FasTrack (score: 1): Author: Craig Henry <tiga_s2@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:01:40 -0800 (PST); Tyson, I know how you feel with respect to a major change discussion when just committing to a new class. In '91 when I took the gamble to purchase my first S2 vs. a FF the very night I took delivery; /html/autox-cm/2004-02/msg00018.html (8,846 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]