Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anti\s+seize\s+goop\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anti\s+seize\s+goop\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Anti seize goop (score: 1): Author: Jody Levine <jody.p.levine@hydro.on.ca>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 1994 11:23:14 -0500; Hmm, I don't remember a consesus, so here's my plug. I swear by that silver anti seize compound on the label of which says "tighten to spec". I swear at myself if I notice years later that I forgot; /html/british-cars/1994-03/msg00149.html (7,620 bytes)
2. Re: Anti seize goop (score: 1): Author: lupienj@wal.hp.com (John Lupien); Date: Mon, 7 Mar 94 12:19:54 EST; Many torque specs give a range. When tightening with anti-seize, I tend to use the lower end of the range. Here Here!!! Will the honorable member from Toronto please take a bow! -- -- John R. Lupien; /html/british-cars/1994-03/msg00154.html (6,852 bytes)
3. Re: Anti seize goop (score: 1): Author: Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 94 9:27:48 PST; I also like this stuff a lot. Just keep in mind that fasteners generally have two torquing specs: one for dry and one for lubricated. The lubricated value is lower for the reason stated. If you're n; /html/british-cars/1994-03/msg00155.html (7,733 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]