Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Alpine\s+\/\s+MGB\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Alpine\s+\/\s+MGB\s+\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: "Russ Eshelman" <RussE@Firstva.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:08:43 -0500; An article that appeared in the January issue of Thoroughbred & Classic Cars, "your questions" section by Phil Bell. Please could you answer me this age old question ( I've never seen a satisfactory; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00107.html (7,534 bytes)
2. Re: Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: ellis838@concentric.net; Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:26:38 -0500; Well not sure about the rest of you but it is perfectly obvious to me that Mr. Bell's mother wears combat boots and had to tie a pork chop around his neck when he was a kid to get the dog to play wit; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00108.html (8,242 bytes)
3. Re: Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: jumpinjan <jservaites@woh.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:39:21 -0800; I would say that the Alpine was way ahead of all the low cost UK sports cars in 1960. The problem was it had a short and troubled life compared to the rest. The Triumphs and MGBs became more refined; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00109.html (8,548 bytes)
4. Re: Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: TIGEROOTES@aol.com; Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 21:23:09 EST; John, In many ways you are comparing apples and oranges. Unlike the MGB, the Alpine chassis never had to undergo a several hundred pound reinforcement to install a larger engine (I refer to the MGC; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00121.html (9,365 bytes)
5. Re: Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: Alex McGregor <awmcgregor@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 21:05:44 -0600; I always though an MBG was stronger, frame-wise. Back in 69 I was stopped waiting to turn in my fisrt S1. I got rear-ended by an MGB. At the last moment he tried to swerve around me and hit my bumper; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00122.html (10,522 bytes)
6. Re: Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: JACranwell@aol.com; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 13:06:44 EST; What absolute rot and balderdash. Cocaine is more ubiquitous than decent Claret on the streets of London nowadays. That does not make it the obvious choice for the discerning connoisseur! Whichever h; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00127.html (7,420 bytes)
7. Re: Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: JACranwell@aol.com; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 13:07:43 EST; Well said that man. Julian.; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00128.html (7,107 bytes)
8. Re: Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: JACranwell@aol.com; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 13:33:24 EST; How eloquently put. I also spent many an hour enjoyably tinkering with MGB's as a young mechanic. Funnily enough my main job was converting UK MGB's to 'UK spec'. Given that 80% of 'B's were being e; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00129.html (8,003 bytes)
9. Re: Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: TIGEROOTES@aol.com; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:36:37 EST; Your "Sleeping Policemen" are called "speed bumps" here in the States and they can be real trouble to negotiate without crushing the headers in my lowered Tiger. Here in Seattle, we are now getting; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00132.html (7,627 bytes)
10. Re: Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: JACranwell@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 18:08:51 EST; I hate to admit this, but your road circles are yet another British invention. We call them 'roundabouts', and we've had them here for at least 60 years. Not to put too fine a point on it, they're a; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00141.html (7,362 bytes)
11. Re: Alpine / MGB ? (score: 1): Author: "Russell & Neola" <rmaddock@petrie.hotkey.net.au>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:59:20 +1000; <evil> Not if you drive an Imp they're not. I've got a series of them not far from home. It's like having a race track on my doorstep. Bwaahhhahahahahahaha </evil> Russ; /html/alpines/2002-12/msg00154.html (7,673 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]