Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Alloy\s+XPAG\s+blocks\.\.\.1500\s+CC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Alloy\s+XPAG\s+blocks\.\.\.1500\s+CC\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Alloy XPAG blocks...1500 CC (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 22:37:16 EST; Yes, its possible...who might be interested?; /html/mg-t/2000-03/msg00000.html (6,148 bytes)
2. Re: Alloy XPAG blocks...1500 CC (score: 1): Author: "Ray McCrary" <turbine44@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 08:42:13 CST; Hello all, Would not an alloy block need to be re-engineered for strength? Best, Ray; /html/mg-t/2000-03/msg00001.html (6,745 bytes)
3. RE: Alloy XPAG blocks...1500 CC (score: 1): Author: "Hermance, Jonathan" <Jonathan_Hermance@ATK.COM>; Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 09:58:32 -0600; What was the original message prior to this one? Does Alloy Blocks XPAG ... 1500 CC mean XPAG 1250 CC and XPEG 1500 CC? I would have interest in learning more about the cost and liklihood of 1250 CC; /html/mg-t/2000-03/msg00002.html (7,673 bytes)
4. Re: Alloy XPAG blocks...1500 CC (score: 1): Author: cederstrand@earthlink.net (Carl Cederstrand); Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 16:32:33 -0800 (PST); Aficionados Arise, I suspect our Mr. Ray McCrary is quite correct. The block would have to be re-engineered to allow for the lower strength of aluminum. As a more pedestrian project, is there a fire; /html/mg-t/2000-03/msg00003.html (8,042 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]