Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Allowing\s+Overbore\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Allowing\s+Overbore\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Allowing Overbore (score: 1): Author: "Jonathan Amo" <webmaster@landracing.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 18:48:56 -0700; Currently the rule for the motorcycle class lets them increase cyclinder bore to .020 over for minor block reconditioning, beyond the maximum displacement for engine class. Now this came about for th; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00496.html (7,682 bytes)
2. Re: Allowing Overbore (score: 1): Author: "Mike Manghelli" <mmanghel@hughes.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:00:22 -0800; Just trying to stir thing up, are we? The .020 overbore that is allowed on motorcycles is a bone of contention with the car guys because several have been thrown out of impound because a bore measur; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00503.html (9,287 bytes)
3. Re: Allowing Overbore (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:09:40 -0600; Come on RAIN.... I understand what Dave is saying here... and agree that the cranks are expensive.... hell my motor is down on Cubes because I want the ability to bore it later... I do wish the class; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00504.html (10,975 bytes)
4. Re: Allowing Overbore (score: 1): Author: "Jonathan Amo" <webmaster@landracing.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 22:09:25 -0700; Mike and list, wasn't trying to stir things up just wanted clarification as to the rule book does not clarify that as you stated it, "Minor reconditioning is defined as taking the stock bore and all; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00505.html (10,319 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]