- 1. Re: Air injectors and performance (WAS: MGB '69 better than '67?) (score: 1)
- Author: "A. B. Bonds" <ab@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>
- Date: 16 Nov 1995 09:40:55 -0600
- A bit off the subject, but still the same thread.... Someone recently commented that the air-injected heads were _stronger_ because of the cast-in bosses. Sorry, not my experience, nor that of many o
- /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00335.html (8,279 bytes)
- 2. Re: Air injectors and performance (WAS: MGB '69 better than '67?) (score: 1)
- Author: fickes@taurus.apple.com (Stan Fickes)
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 10:03:50 -0800
- I have considered going to an electric motor for the Sprite, but decided I couldn't afford the amp and speakers to reproduce the sound. It would have to be integrated with the loud pedal and road sp
- /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00347.html (7,832 bytes)
- 3. Re: Air injectors and performance (WAS: MGB '69 better than '67?) (score: 1)
- Author: Jeremy DuBois <jer@thlogic.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 12:15:48 -0500 (EST)
- Hmmm... Interesting. Lindsay Porter, in his MGB Resto book, claims the air injected heads are stronger, I believe based on the advice of the machine shop he was using. (Its in the section about bori
- /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00365.html (8,369 bytes)
- 4. Re: Air injectors and performance (WAS: MGB '69 better than '67?) (score: 1)
- Author: "Unger, Larry @ MAN" <UNGERL@Reston.UnisysGSG.COM>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 95 09:34:00 EST
- ->> A bit off the subject, but still the same thread.... Someone recently ->> commented that the air-injected heads were _stronger_ because of the ->> cast-in bosses. Sorry, not my experience, nor t
- /html/mgs/1995-11/msg00378.html (8,737 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu