Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Adjustable\s+Swaybars\s+\-\s+One\s+or\s+Both\s+Ends\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Adjustable\s+Swaybars\s+\-\s+One\s+or\s+Both\s+Ends\?\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: "John Coffey" <johncof@ibm.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 12:43:47 -0700; In a discussion with a local suspension guru the point was made that adjustable swaybars really only need to be adjusted on one end, thus the adjustable bars that have adjusting holes on both ends re; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00114.html (8,564 bytes)
2. RE: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: John Steczkowski <stecz@Crossroads.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:45:39 -0500; Cool thought, so if you have 3 settings on each end, you really have 9 settings (taking into account all of the permutations). -- John Steczkowski Director, Server I/O Crossroads Systems, Inc. 512-79; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00115.html (9,597 bytes)
3. RE: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: Jefrem Iwaniw <jiwaniw@iigo.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:55:46 -0500 (CDT); Except for the fact that this thought doesn't take into account the fact that most (all?) swaybars use a "lever" as part of their twisting/springing/load-transferring activity, and by moving the moun; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00117.html (10,591 bytes)
4. RE: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: "Meyer, Brian J" <Brian.Meyer@Wichita.BOEING.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 15:01:30 -0500; He's right. Adjustment only needs to be made on one end. However, adjusting only one side is only half as effective as doing both. For example, lets say a swaybar has adjustment range so that the eff; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00118.html (10,691 bytes)
5. Re: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: Mike Bultemeier <hottvr@tfs.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 15:10:34 -0500; I have sway bars on the S2000 that are infinatly adjustable. In other words they slide as opposed to using a hole for location. If you lossen only one side, you can't slide it very far without it bin; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00120.html (11,474 bytes)
6. RE: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: Alan Pozner <AlanP@identicard.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:26:39 -0400; If the sway bar is attached to the chassis at 2 points that are far apart from eachother and close to the ends in a way that doesn't allow the entire bar to twist, then adjusting just one side will p; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00121.html (11,120 bytes)
7. Re: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 16:48:46 -0400; Sure you can, but you also need to adjust the length of that drop link (the piece that slides along the bar) so that the preload remains at zero. If you adjust both ends, you generally don't need to; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00125.html (8,829 bytes)
8. RE: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: "John Coffey" <johncof@ibm.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:01:34 -0700; I thought that too, but swaybars transfer a given load (weight) based on their spring rate. In vehicle roll, where the inside of the vehicle rises and the outside of the vehicle drops, the same load; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00127.html (9,306 bytes)
9. RE: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: "John Coffey" <johncof@ibm.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:37:39 -0700; Well... I was wrong. I thought about it some more and was further educated by a couple of replies to my original message. The same holds true for a sway bar in bump too! You only need to adjust one e; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00131.html (9,418 bytes)
10. Re: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:37:53 EDT; Wrong, send the guru back to the mountain cave for some more internal reflection on the matter! Swaybars are cornering springs. Spring rates are force per unit of distance, not just force alone. Your; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00132.html (9,805 bytes)
11. Re: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 18:26:55 -0400 (EDT); I'm far from an expert, but in the ideal realm, wouldn't the length of the lever arm be the length of _both_ sides of the swaybar? If you've got: ** * *B * *A Then pushing up B gives you less levera; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00135.html (9,925 bytes)
12. Re: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 22:57:55 -0500; --Original Message-- From: Jefrem Iwaniw <jiwaniw@iigo.com> To: John Steczkowski <stecz@Crossroads.com> Cc: 'John Coffey' <johncof@ibm.net>; Team. Net (E-mail) <autox@autox.team.net> Date: Tuesday, A; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00160.html (12,008 bytes)
13. Re: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 23:02:03 -0500; --Original Message-- From: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu> To: Mike Bultemeier <hottvr@tfs.net> Cc: Meyer, Brian J <Brian.Meyer@Wichita.BOEING.com>; Team. Net (E-mail) <autox@autox.team.net> Date; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00161.html (9,746 bytes)
14. Re: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 21:14:26 -0700; Wow, Phil, I think you're right, and that I've been wrong about this for My Formula Ford had an adjustable rear swaybar where only one side was adjustable. But it was a blade-type adjuster, as oppose; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00162.html (13,098 bytes)
15. Re: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 23:35:15 -0500; Never checked that out. Should have looked at that when I was in Topeka. Sounds interesting. Are these things common on race cars? Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA Lotus Europa, VW Quantum Syncro; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00164.html (8,894 bytes)
16. Re: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: "B. Vibert" <blur@ican.net>; Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 03:28:45 -0400; Here's a question for the suspension guru. My club uses a go-kart track for a course quite often. Most of the left turns are hairpins. Most of the right turns are quite a bit faster. Also, there are; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00172.html (9,452 bytes)
17. Re: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 11:43:31 -0400; You make a good point but you're actually ignoring another factor (and I don't know whether it would make matters better or worse). The *suspension* would move three inches on both sides -- or rather; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00195.html (9,028 bytes)
18. RE: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: "John Coffey" <johncof@ibm.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 09:32:22 -0700; Phil elucidated: car effect I'm so confused! I've got to think a while... maybe have a drink. -- John Coffey johncof@ibm.net; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00203.html (9,036 bytes)
19. RE: Adjustable Swaybars - One or Both Ends? (score: 1): Author: John Steczkowski <stecz@Crossroads.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 16:47:09 -0500; I stayed out of this for awhile, but this is a really good point.... The distance between the pivot point and the end is important, so given that you want the same roll stiffness on left and right tu; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00229.html (10,133 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]