Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.3\s+Merkur\s+engine\s+$not\s+Mercury$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.3\s+Merkur\s+engine\s+$not\s+Mercury$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 2.3 Merkur engine (not Mercury) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:26:38 -0700 (GMT-07:00); A friend of mine here in Denver is putting a turbo Merkur engine in a Spitfire. He is having to modify the bonnet. He is doing a first class job of it with a fabricated suspension using a Mazda diff; /html/triumphs/2004-03/msg00997.html (7,229 bytes)
2. Re: 2.3 Merkur engine (not Mercury) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:24:09 -0500; Hmmm, I guess the Merkur sold better in some parts of the country than it did here in upstate New York. I saw very few here when they were new, let alone 20 years later! --Andy Mace; /html/triumphs/2004-03/msg00998.html (6,613 bytes)
3. Re: 2.3 Merkur engine (not Mercury) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:48:00 EST; << I guess the Merkur sold better in some parts of the country than it did here in upstate New York >> The sales were spotty. The engine is the same as a T bird Turbo coupe and the Mustang Turbo. The; /html/triumphs/2004-03/msg01001.html (6,638 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]