Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1999\s+Cobra\s+Autox\s+Classification\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1999\s+Cobra\s+Autox\s+Classification\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: "Crites, Carl D" <ccrites@ou.edu>; Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:02:37 -0600; Does anybody know if the 1999 Mustang Cobra with the IRS is going to be classed in F-Stock or is it going to be bumped up to SS? Carl; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00233.html (7,501 bytes)
2. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Ghsharp@aol.com; Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:37:06 EST; No one knows. And no one_will_know until they actually show up at Ford dealers so that SCAC and the SEB can confirm the cars specs. We plan to make a decision as soon as possible after the cars are a; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00235.html (8,125 bytes)
3. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 07:34:46 -0800; The SCAC has tabled this car until a production unit hits the streets. There is a TON of speculation on the car but for all we know, the car will come with the supercharger (as seen on the new Lightn; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00236.html (8,613 bytes)
4. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Carl Couric <carlc@iname.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 11:10:53 -0500; I would like to remind the "board" that the T-Bird with IRS is already allowed in FS. Just because no one raced them at Nationals is not a reason to kill the Mustang with IRS. Camaro 5.7L V8 = Mustan; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00238.html (9,127 bytes)
5. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 08:27:50 -0800; What you have to remember is that this car isn't out yet. Why would we class it if we don't know what the final version will look like? With the rumors of the demise of the F-bodies earlier in 1998,; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00239.html (9,525 bytes)
6. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Carl Couric <carlc@iname.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 11:44:47 -0500; I have seen the 99 Mustangs. Same body as SN95. Its not a Corvette competitor, Ford might go after them with the new T-Bird. Same chassis, different fenders. We (the FOX body group) have been stealin; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00241.html (9,961 bytes)
7. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: whitney <whitneys@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 11:28:15 -0800; Specs for the car are pretty firm right now I think, as It was shown in production form at last year's SEMA show. 17x8" wheels, 320hp, IRS, still sits way off the ground (check out some of the pictur; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00243.html (8,517 bytes)
8. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: John Whitling <alliancemillsoft@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 13:01:18 -0500; I just had to jump in here. The Camaros were kept in FS when chevy went with the 350 ... 50 cubes more than Mustangs or prev Camaros. The Camaros were kept in FS when chevy built the 1LEs. Camaros ha; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00248.html (10,478 bytes)
9. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:51:14 -0800; What is the problem here? Yes it would be great if Ford had a competitive Mustang for F-Stock but we don't REALLY know yet what the car will be like when it hits the street. There are some people who; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00255.html (11,233 bytes)
10. RE: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Lindsay Wilson <lwilson1@ford.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 12:09:04 -0700; OK, this is as 'official' as I can get. :) '99 SVT Cobra Mustang introduced at Las Vegas SEMA show. HP +15, T +15, for '99. 320 hp @ 6,000 rpm, T 315. All new IRS. '99 Mustang GT; hp 260 @ 5,250, T 3; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00256.html (12,044 bytes)
11. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Walter Fooshee <wfooshee@csi.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:24:42 -0600; But what does a T-Bird weigh, 3800+ lbs.??? Walter Fooshee Dixie Region Probe GT; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00270.html (8,159 bytes)
12. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: rohns@doitnow.com (Jim & Marilyn Rohn); Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 19:51:10 -0700 (MST); and it weighs ... how much more??? It's wheelbase is ... how much longer??? And the torque/hp numbers are ... what again??? What??? massively LESS than the 99 Cobra??? Gee, it sounds like a GREAT car; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00277.html (8,634 bytes)
13. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Carl Couric <carlc@iname.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 09:31:17 -0500; Hello, MCFLY... Its a FOX box... Ford used the same platform on the T-Bird as it did on the Mustang... As to weight, the T-Bird has bit more but its a better balance. We use to have a guy race one in; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00297.html (9,738 bytes)
14. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Doug Mallory <rdmallory@earthling.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:54:01 -0500; The Lincoln MKVIII has been in Fstock Same platform as the T-bird with a 290 hp quad cam 4.6 (Due to single exhaust) and IRS with traction control. 17 inch wheels and 300 hp on LSC with dual exhaust.; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00298.html (8,799 bytes)
15. Re: 1999 Cobra Autox Classification (score: 1): Author: Walter Fooshee <wfooshee@csi.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 17:46:02 -0600; The same platform doesn't make them comparable cars... Witness the Dodge minivan and the Aires/Reliant, not to mention the Daytona. Same platform (K-car). Should they be classed together? As to the S; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00336.html (10,615 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]