Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1600\s+rear\s+vs\s+2000\s+swap\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1600\s+rear\s+vs\s+2000\s+swap\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: Geegc@aol.com; Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:35:01 EDT; I drove my 1600 last night for the first time in months (after adjusting the clutch) and was amazed at how much better it pulls in 1st and 2nd than my 2000 solex 5 speed. Anyone switch the rear ends; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01078.html (7,758 bytes)
2. Re: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: CalSpeed@aol.com; Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:53:20 EDT; << I drove my 1600 last night for the first time in months (after adjusting clutch) and was amazed at how much better it pulls in 1st and 2nd than my 2000 solex 5 speed. Anyone switch the rear ends f; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01079.html (8,256 bytes)
3. Re: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:23:22 -0400; The 4 speed has lower 1st and 2nd gears, hence the pulling. Some 2L Solex owners reported they had trouble keeping up with my little 1600. the it is; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01085.html (8,692 bytes)
4. Re: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Murphy" <solex67@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 17:50:45 PDT; I drove Roman Rist's 1966 1600 and will agree that off the line his car is faster than my 67 2000 Solex. The Solex powered engine and the different gearing on the 2000 model make for great top end p; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01090.html (9,277 bytes)
5. Re: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:08:24 -0700; No. No. Best approach would be to let a shop take a look at it. -- Gordon Glasgow http://www.gordon-glasgow.org; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01095.html (8,104 bytes)
6. Re: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: Jsk977@aol.com; Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 22:43:15 EDT; With Solex's, the "B" cam, and a relativley high 1st gear ratio, the stock 3.70 rear was clearly a mis match. The first thing I did when I got my Solex roadster back in '67 was to install the Nissan; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01097.html (7,992 bytes)
7. Re: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: Dennis Currington <dc311@mail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 23:22:22 -0700; I think I need to go on one of these drives with you guys next time. I never met a 1600 or S.U. 2000 that I couldn't get off the line and all the way up. Wonder if my 3.70 1st gear has anything to do; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01105.html (10,034 bytes)
8. Re: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: David & Candy Pina <casalp@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:26:27 -0700; How do you like the 4.62 gearing? I am contemplating putting my 4.62 LSD in my 2000. I've got a 5.13 locker in it now and all first gear is good for is burning my 225x50x14 R1s. :-) Fun but not fast; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01109.html (8,170 bytes)
9. Re: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: David & Candy Pina <casalp@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:44:45 -0700; Want to try me? David Pina 67.5 SU 2000; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01113.html (7,728 bytes)
10. Re: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: CalSpeed@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:56:02 EDT; << Dennis, Want to try me? David Pina >> Ohhhhhhh...... Do I hear a SoCalROC -vs- BADROC challenge? YEah baby..... Lets see what those "hill runners" got. Just wait 'till Fred gets his "possible" rac; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01116.html (8,008 bytes)
11. RE: 1600 rear Vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: "Laury, Victor" <LauryV@MTA.NET>; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:59:46 -0700; Although I have very limited experience, The R-1's hold tight or break loose, nothing in between. they don't give much (any)warning before breaking either. 205-55-14's on 5.5 rims 28psi front, 24psi; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01118.html (8,605 bytes)
12. Re: 1600 rear Vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: David & Candy Pina <casalp@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:49:48 -0700; I am running 225x50x14 Toyo R1s on 6" rims. The last time I ran I used 36 psi in front and 32 psi rears. I use white shoe polish to mark 4 places on the shoulder of the tires to see how much roll ov; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01124.html (8,948 bytes)
13. Re: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: SRL311KA@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 21:20:30 EDT; Hey guys, I'm running 205/50ZR15 with a 3.7 open diff. I really like the gearing but would kill for an LSD. I'm probably running an engine with more torque that the average roadster so the gearing is; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01138.html (7,864 bytes)
14. Fwd: 1600 rear vs 2000 swap (score: 1): Author: BONeild@aol.com; Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:24:25 EDT; << I've got a 5.13 locker in it now and all first gear is good for is burning my 225x50x14 R1s. :-) Fun but not fast. You other autox pilots out there, what size wheels/ tires do you run? Is there a; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-08/msg01174.html (9,670 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]