Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\/100ths\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+Autocross\s+Timing$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\/100ths\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+Autocross\s+Timing$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. 1/100ths (was Re: Autocross Timing) (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 22:13:47 -0700 (PDT); I'd be for at least discussing it. We haven't established so much as a standard height for timing lights AFAIK, which is bound to result in some error among various types of car. Yes, I'm aware the e; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00195.html (8,087 bytes)
2. RE: 1/100ths (was Re: Autocross Timing) (score: 1): Author: "Glen E. Thompson" <glen.thompson@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 22:40:46 -0400; Where it could make a difference is in height variations between the start and finish lights. As Dennis Laczny of Raceamerica points out, it requires at least 1/2 inch of solid object to trip the sen; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00255.html (10,096 bytes)
3. RE: 1/100ths (was Re: Autocross Timing) (score: 1): Author: dennis@raceamerica.com; Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 11:23:22 -0700; You are right on the money. Height placement of the sensing equipment can be THE most critical variables contributing to inaccurate times for exactly the reasons in your example. We generally sugges; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00319.html (10,545 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]