Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[slightly\s+OT\]\s+vehicle\s+mass\,\s+tread\s+width\,\s+and\s+hydroplaning\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Matt Liggett <mml@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:59:26 -0500
Apologies for the off-topic material, but I couldn't think of a better list to ask. Suggestions to that effect are welcome. I've got a 2001 Honda Civic LX Sedan. The car supposedly weighs 2465 lbs a
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00100.html (9,376 bytes)

2. RE: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Randall Young <ryoung@NAVCOMTECH.COM>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:55:07 -0800
It definitely depends on what you are doing, but in general there's no hard relation between tire width and car weight. _If_ everything else is equal, then narrow tires do have an advantage in some
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00101.html (10,255 bytes)

3. RE: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Kaplan" <keithka@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:23:32 -0800
The tires can be a lot of the difference. Without going way OT into a tire debate, let me say how much I love Bridgestone S02s. Good wet/dry grip, gradual transition from stick to slide. The new S03s
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00102.html (10,384 bytes)

4. RE: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: David Hillman <hillman@planet-torque.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 20:17:31 -0500 (EST)
They aren't going to work much at all in snow or on ice. I had RE-92s as OEM on my Subaru, and I autocrossed them on snow, on ice, and on pavement. I found them poor on each surface. There is no excu
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00103.html (10,744 bytes)

5. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Chris Heerschap <Heerschap@kns.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 23:05:42 -0500
Seriously, try different tires before you go narrower. Narrower tires will compromise the dry handling, and that's probably what you do most of. I've seen Civics and Integras running 205 width tires
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00104.html (11,499 bytes)

6. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Randall <ryoung@navcomtech.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 20:30:13 -0800
Just for the record, I was _NOT_ recommending the RE92, it was just the first thing I ran across in a 165-wide 14" tire. So, unless I can afford two full sets of racing tires (or to stay home when i
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00105.html (10,133 bytes)

7. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: "Nolan Penney" <npenney@mde.state.md.us>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 07:49:04 -0500
More then the width, the tire design itself greatly affects your traction. Be that dry pavement, rain and hydroplaning, snow, ice or whatever else you chose. Fwiw, my pickup, running various Michlin'
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00107.html (11,572 bytes)

8. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Rush <jdrush@enter.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:23:33 -0500
I read your message and all the replies. Then I did what I always do when the great tire debate comes up, checked out the Tirerack web site. I plugged in your tire size and checked off high performan
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00108.html (12,232 bytes)

9. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: David Hillman <hillman@planet-torque.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:08:27 -0500 (EST)
No. If you care about controlling your vehicle ( and *not* rolling over and dying ), you should keep proper tires on it. If you don't mind sliding around out-of-control and having no options to avoid
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00110.html (10,537 bytes)

10. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Chris Heerschap <Heerschap@kns.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:02:43 -0500
Aha, gotcha. Whoa! Easy! What I was agreeing with was that if you really want good traction in the snow, you need snow tires. You can get decent or passable traction with all-seasons, but it won't be
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00112.html (12,020 bytes)

11. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:48:04 -0800
When I was in college, I had a $50 Audi Fox. I drove this car hard, usually wearing out a set of front tires in 5k miles. (the Fox is a front-drive car). At one point I put a set of all-weather tires
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00113.html (10,019 bytes)

12. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Matt Wehland <mattw@webtripper.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:32:08 -0600
The only thing that I can add to this thread is a thought on tire cost. I figure that the cost is only more up front, with 2 sets of tires, they won't see as much use and will last much longer, there
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00117.html (11,457 bytes)

13. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Chris Heerschap <Heerschap@kns.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:00:55 -0500
Not only that, the soft compound of summer tires can actually be damaged by cold, to the point that they become low-traction bricks. I distinctly remember the first time I subjected my SP8000s to sub
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00119.html (10,545 bytes)

14. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Rush <jdrush@enter.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:15:59 -0500
Yep! That's about what my basement looks like. Garsh. <Looks down and twists toe into dirt> I thought the Arctic Alpines looked like a great solution, but they just weren't aggressive enough in the s
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00136.html (10,204 bytes)

15. Re: [slightly OT] vehicle mass, tread width, and hydroplaning (score: 1)
Author: Matt Liggett <mml@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:09:13 -0500
I want to thank everyone for taking the time to reply. I've decided to spring for 4 all-season performance tires and see what improvements I get. I'm going to try to contact other Civic drivers for s
/html/shop-talk/2002-01/msg00152.html (8,509 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu