- 1. [oletrucks] Step on stepside? (score: 1)
- Author: Ryan Sain <rsain@gte.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 12:37:56 -0700
- Hi all! This may be a dumb question, but I'll ask it anyway as I can't seem to be able to find out on my own.... Is the step part of a stepside (59) the same on the 3100s as it is on the 3200s? I fou
- /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00568.html (7,233 bytes)
- 2. RE: [oletrucks] Step on stepside? (score: 1)
- Author: "Hanlon, Bill (ISS Houston)" <bill.hanlon@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:48:35 -0500
- Nope. The 31xx (GMC model 101, short bed 1/2 ton) step is shorter (front to back, not top to bottom) than the 32xx (GMC model 102, 89" long bed 1/2 ton) step. Hi all! This may be a dumb question, but
- /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00571.html (7,909 bytes)
- 3. Re: [oletrucks] Step on stepside? (score: 1)
- Author: Ribbit2@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:06:21 EDT
- The 3200 is a lot longer, the 3200 is a long bed half ton and two step braces under it instead of one, the braces are the same. guessing it is about ten inches longer. Jim H 57-3100 oletrucks is devo
- /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00574.html (6,909 bytes)
- 4. Re: [oletrucks] Step on stepside? (score: 1)
- Author: Devin Ranger <devin_ranger@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
- Howdy Ryan. No, the 3200 (32) steps are longer than the 3100 steps. But the 3200 steps are the same as the 3600 (36) steps. Drew == Drew http://www.oltrucks.com http://www.norselander.com ///////////
- /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00575.html (8,255 bytes)
- 5. Re: [oletrucks] Step on stepside? (score: 1)
- Author: Ryan Sain <rsain@gte.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:30:45 -0700
- Thanks everyone - you confirmed my suspicions. On to the next question: Does anyone need a set for a 3200 (in decent condition)? And the next: Does anyone have a set for a 3100 that they want to get
- /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00612.html (8,901 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu