Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Re\:\s+What\'s\s+the\s+original\s+width\s+of\s+a\s+\'53\s+1\/2\s+ton\s+differential\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Re\:\s+What\'s\s+the\s+original\s+width\s+of\s+a\s+\'53\s+1\/2\s+ton\s+differential\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Re: What's the original width of a '53 1/2 ton differential? (score: 1): Author: WR Teto <monadnoc@wgserv.crystal-mtn.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 01:34:14 -0400; Funny you should ask Jon. I got all those measurements from my 53 1/2 ton, and the distance across from backing plate to backing plate was approximately 55". I don't suppose you're in my area (Massac; /html/oletrucks/1999-06/msg00378.html (7,469 bytes)
2. [oletrucks] Re: What's the original width of a '53 1/2 ton differential? (score: 1): Author: WR Teto <monadnoc@wgserv.crystal-mtn.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 01:25:13 -0400; Jon, yeah I guess it would cost more than it's worth to ship a rear end across country! But they are the original rears with the closed tube drive shaft. The one off the truck has the brake drums and; /html/oletrucks/1999-06/msg00407.html (7,552 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]