Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Re\:\s+GVW\s+discrepancies\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Re\:\s+GVW\s+discrepancies\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Re: GVW discrepancies? (score: 1): Author: Dave Quirt <quirt@sk.sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 10:54:46 -0600; The VIN decoders are OK for most standard installations, but they miss most of the optional items. My father-in-laws '53 1-ton has a 9,600 GVW according to the VIN plate, while my '50 GMC 1-ton part; /html/oletrucks/2001-02/msg00362.html (7,300 bytes)
2. [oletrucks] Re: GVW discrepancies? (score: 1): Author: Dave Quirt <quirt@sk.sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 19:45:06 -0600; Mostly in the springs. As I noted earlier, a 9,600 GVW 1-ton is essentially the same as the standard truck except for the springing and wider tires, as both trucks have single rear wheels. But, perh; /html/oletrucks/2001-02/msg00382.html (7,045 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Re: GVW discrepancies? (score: 1): Author: John Dorsey <jrdorsey@strato.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:40:36 +0800; Probably so, but I wonder if it's just what the fella at the factory felt like stamping in the plate that day! The shop manual i have is for 1954, and it lists 1 tons GVW's from 6200 to 10000 lbs de; /html/oletrucks/2001-02/msg00384.html (8,481 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]