Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Was\s+UD\/BD\s+ST\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Was\s+UD\/BD\s+ST\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: "Dave Whitworth" <dave@wcsllc.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:13:15 -0500; I'm not one to normally worry about wasting bandwidth, but is it necessary to have THESE SAME STINKING ARGUMENTS EVERY 6 MONTHS???? It's the same arguments, from the same people, about fixing the sam; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00193.html (11,862 bytes)
2. RE: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:08:08 -0500; I'm having a hard time understanding how a misnomer means that a category should be integrated into another one. If your issue is with the name "Street Prepared", then why not just propose changing; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00209.html (8,788 bytes)
3. Re: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: bthatch@juno.com; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:42:46 -0400; I don't think SP looks like it is in trouble right now. And I'm not suggesting that SP be merged into Prepared, right now. I DO think that in the future that the category will begin to decline becau; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00210.html (10,041 bytes)
4. Re: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: James Rogerson <jrogerson@Houston.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:02:46 -0500; I have to disagree with you. There are fewer and fewer prepared cars in solo except for CP. If they let GT cars run rampant there, it would diminish as well. The gap between the solo community and cl; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00211.html (8,922 bytes)
5. Re: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:51:41 -0400; FYI, 15.11 allows GT cars to compete in their respective Prepared classes. That's been there for quite some time, and has never bothered me too much. What bothered me about it is that it allows you; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00212.html (8,799 bytes)
6. Re: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: "Jason" <jasondjackson@excite.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:09:28 -0400 (EDT); Our sport, since the introduction of the R compound tire, has been at the mercy of the tire manufacturers who want to participate/market to our group. Yokahama came, left and is now back. General was; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00217.html (9,538 bytes)
7. Re: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:03:28 -0400; If the Azenis were more expensive than Hoosiers, you might see attrition, but perhaps not all that much. The Azenis is still useful as a street tire.... (at least when new) What I suggested is a bit; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00218.html (10,710 bytes)
8. Re: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: "Jason" <jasondjackson@excite.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:51:39 -0400 (EDT); I wonder how many ST soloists actually drive, in good weather, on their race tires? Your argument is completely valid Mike. Driving across town to an event is different than a 2-3 hour commute that m; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00227.html (8,675 bytes)
9. Re: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 00:42:19 EDT; Except that we reserve the right to put a tire on an exclusion list at any time. and we will if we need to. Charlie /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00248.html (8,302 bytes)
10. Re: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:33:07 -0400; Wasn't the exclusion list designed to stop a tire from being dominant? If yes, then I noticed the Azenis isn't on it. Sure, it doesn't win every time, but it sure is dominant. I'd bet that it's more; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00249.html (9,057 bytes)
11. Re: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:11:19 EDT; No, it is designed to keep a tire that doesn't fit the STS class, because of unstreetability, cost, or (lack of) longevity from being dominant. It's dominant because it's cheap. More people buy them; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00250.html (9,631 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]