Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Faster\s+Cars\,\s+Tighter\s+Courses\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Faster\s+Cars\,\s+Tighter\s+Courses\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [evolution-disc.] Faster Cars, Tighter Courses? (score: 1): Author: Alan Dahl <alandahl@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:27:57 -0800; I think Katie's hit the nail on the head here. In addition not only are all classes getting faster but the top classes are speeding up more than the slower classes, increasing the performance spread; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00117.html (7,948 bytes)
2. Re: [evolution-disc.] Faster Cars, Tighter Courses? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:34:34 -0500; --On February 22, 2006 12:27:57 AM -0800 Alan Dahl <alandahl@mac.com> Alan, are you talking about the spread between HS and SS, or HS and AM, or FJr and AM? I'm not sure I agree; I have Nationals res; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00120.html (8,232 bytes)
3. Re: [evolution-disc.] Faster Cars, Tighter Courses? (score: 1): Author: Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:31:16 -0800 (PST); Gut feeling or not, Mark, you can't deny that "unprepared" cars built today are faster than those from 1990. Can you? If I'm wrong, why is you never see Porsche 914s anymore, or Dodge Colts. The poin; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00126.html (9,063 bytes)
4. Re: [evolution-disc.] Faster Cars, Tighter Courses? (score: 1): Author: "pethier@isd.net" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:50:35 -0600; We have four of them in our club, from Stock to Modified. Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1962 TR4 CT2846L, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1993 Suburban, 1994 Miata C package pethier@isd.net http:/; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00128.html (7,649 bytes)
5. Re: [evolution-disc.] Faster Cars, Tighter Courses? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:13:24 -0500; --On February 22, 2006 10:31:16 AM -0800 Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com> I agree completely, Katie. I was only concerned with Alan's assertion about the spread between slow and fast; I claim the sl; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00133.html (8,342 bytes)
6. Re: [evolution-disc.] Faster Cars, Tighter Courses? (score: 1): Author: Alan Dahl <alandahl@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 01:28:00 -0800; Depends on the base year you are using I suppose. I picked 1993 as an arbitrary year since the C4 Corvettes were still dominant in SS. If you compare a C6 Z06 with a 1993-prep C4 it's going to be a l; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00175.html (8,872 bytes)
7. Re: [evolution-disc.] Faster Cars, Tighter Courses? (score: 1): Author: "Chuck and Donna #42" <teampointless@britsys.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:18:44 -0500; IMHO If the guidelines are followed there will not be a major spread between the fastest and slowest stock classes. It's only when HP can be exercised does the spread expand. A Z06 may be able to acc; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00179.html (10,464 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]